开发者

How to clean up after subprocess.Popen?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-11 07:24 出处:网络
I have a long-running python script with a perl 开发者_Python百科worker subprocess.Data is sent in and out of the child proc through its stdin and stdout. Periodically, the child must be restarted.

I have a long-running python script with a perl 开发者_Python百科worker subprocess. Data is sent in and out of the child proc through its stdin and stdout. Periodically, the child must be restarted.

Unfortunately, after a while of running, it runs out of files ('too many open files'). lsof shows many remaining open pipes.

What's the proper way to clean up after a Popen'd process? Here's what I'm doing right now:

def start_helper(self):
    # spawn perl helper
    cwd = os.path.dirname(__file__)
    if not cwd:
        cwd = '.'

    self.subp = subprocess.Popen(['perl', 'theperlthing.pl'], shell=False, cwd=cwd,
                                 stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
                                 bufsize=1, env=perl_env)

def restart_helper(self):
    # clean up
    if self.subp.stdin:
        self.subp.stdin.close()
    if self.subp.stdout:
        self.subp.stdout.close()
    if self.subp.stderr:
        self.subp.stderr.close()

    # kill
    try:
        self.subp.kill()
    except OSError:
        # can't kill a dead proc
        pass
    self.subp.wait() # ?

    self.start_helper()


I think that's all you need:

def restart_helper(self):
    # kill the process if open
    try:
        self.subp.kill()
    except OSError:
        # can't kill a dead proc
        pass

    self.start_helper()
    # the wait comes after you opened the process
    # if you want to know how the process ended you can add
    # > if self.subp.wait() != 0:
    # usually a process that exits with 0 had no errors
    self.subp.wait()

As far as I know all file objects will be closed before the popen process gets killed.


A quick experiment shows that x = open("/etc/motd"); x = 1 cleans up after itself and leaves no open file descriptor. If you drop the last reference to a subprocess.Popen the pipes seem to stick around. Is it possible you are re-invoking start_helper() (or even some other Popen) without explicitly closing and stopping the old one?

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消