开发者

Is it good idea to use uint instead of int as the primary key in data model class?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-09 12:35 出处:网络
We know that the primary keys are usually positive integers. Is it good idea to use uint instead of int as the primary key in 开发者_JS百科data model class?

We know that the primary keys are usually positive integers.

Is it good idea to use uint instead of int as the primary key in 开发者_JS百科data model class?

Example:

public class Customer
{
   public uint CustomerId {get;set;}
   //others are omitted for the sake of simplicity.
}


The corresponding SQL data type is a signed number, so I'd stick with the int to avoid any surprises.


In case somebody else stumbles on this question - don't use uint for your keys. I've just tried that with Entity Framework 6.1.12 and code kept failing with cryptic "Entity doesn't have key" exception.

Only after I've changed uint property back to int it started working as expected.

So, yeah, it sucks to have 2+ billion range unused, but that's how things are. And if you have even a slight doubt that you may end up with billion plus records, go with long. Ironically, then you'll have 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 numbers unused ;).


uint is not CLS compliant, so it's generally recommended not to use it in public APIs.


I think it's bad idea, cause of int type is more optimized for using in .NET Framework.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消