I just found a TestNG test case that uses Spring to provide its data source. As a result the code is quite clean and concise.
However, I need to expand the test cases so they can take a variable list of inputs.
Am I stuck using bean references for the list of lists as I've attempted below? Is there a way to do that and still be pretty (i.e. not breaking up the logical flow of input followed by output)? Is there a better way?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema开发者_开发百科/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd">
<bean id="stringPatternRegexMap" class="java.util.HashMap">
<constructor-arg>
<map>
<entry key="some input #1" value="expected output #1"/>
<entry key="some input #2" value="expected output #2"/>
<entry key="some input #3" value="expected output #3"/>
<entry key-ref="multi-list-1" value="expected output #3"/>
<entry key-ref="null-reference" value="null-reference"/>
</map>
</constructor-arg>
</bean>
<bean id="multi-list-1">
<list>
<value>apple</value>
<value>banana</value>
<value>orange</value>
</list>
</bean>
<bean id="null-reference">
<value>
<null/>
</value>
</bean>
</beans>
Note that the original code appears to be using a map instead of a list because it seems an easier way to provide a list of String[2].
No, you can use a @DataProvider to feed a test methods with a variable number of parameters:
@DataProvider
public Object[][] dp() {
return new Object[][] {
new Object[] { new Object[] { "a" } },
new Object[] { new Object[] { "b", "c" } },
};
}
@Test(dataProvider = "dp")
public void g1(Object... params) {
System.out.println("Received " + params.length + " parameters");
}
will print:
Received 1 parameters
Received 2 parameters
Note that your test method can declare either "Object..." or "Object[]" (it's the same to the compiler).
I would use TestNG and its DataSource construct as the right way to do this. You certainly can make this Spring configuration, but since it's test code I think TestNG is the more natural home for it.
精彩评论