I'm learning mercurial and I went to commit some changes and I got the message along the lines of "new head created" -- though I could have sworn that I did an hg pull and an hg update prior to doing new work.
I then got confused so I did a merge to try to get out of the mess. The single file I'm working on is fine (again I'm using only one file as I try to learn HG). I can't post my image (not enough points) but I tried to recreate it below.
When I created the tag seo_v_1.0 did I automatically create a branch? In other hg repos I simply create a tag, push the changes and keep going.
Can someone help me decipher what I did here? The only change I made on the repo before the merge thing was that I committed the "up to 33" changset. So maybe -- according to my branch diagram here below -- I was already in the branch but didn't know it? Did the creation of tag seo_v_1.0 inadvertently create a branch?
Thanks in advance.
Note that the line out starts from "seo_v_1.0" to "added tag.." and the line comes back in at "up to 33" to "default tip merge thing"
- default tip merge thing [this is in yellow] [and default is in green]
- up to 33
- added tag seo_v_1.1 for changeset xxxx
- seo_v1.1 cleared colors [this is in 开发者_运维技巧yellow]
- added tag seo_v_1.0 for changeset xxxx
- seo_v_1.0-completed [this is in yellow]
- seo through section 2
- seo cross reference done
- initial commit
Edit: glog output added
@ changeset: 9:8637aa6d738f
|\ tag: tip
| | parent: 8:
| | parent: 7:
| |
| | summary: merge thing
| |
| o changeset: 8:
| | parent: 4:
| |
| | summary: up to 33
| |
o | changeset: 7:
| |
| | summary: Added tag seo_v_1.1 for changeset de5f8c81840f
| |
o | changeset: 6:
| | tag: seo_v_1.1
| |
| |
| | summary: cleared left col colors
| |
o | changeset: 5:
|/
|
| summary: Added tag seo_v_1.0 for changeset c13bd5d3cc09
| o changeset: 4:
| tag: seo_v_1.0
|
| summary: -completed cross-reference
Can you show us the output of "hg glog" with the graphlog extension enabled?
hg --config extensions.graphlog="" glog
You can strip most of the changes, but please leave at least enough changes to show:
- The tag operation
- The merge you did
Creating a tag definitely didn't create a named branch, but it could have created an anonymous branch, because the act modifies the .hgtags
file and then commits.
Give this a quick read; it's immensely helpful:
http://stevelosh.com/blog/2009/08/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial/
I'm sure with the hg glog output Giorgos requested we can help you figure out what happened, but with a little more understanding from that guide you'll probably see it yourself.
精彩评论