开发者

Repeated evaluation of pure expression in IO action

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-08 16:18 出处:网络
I have a procedure that (a) does some IO, (b) constructs a lookup table, and (c) returns an IO action that uses the lookup table. But when compiled with -O, GHC (version 6.12.1) inlines the constructi

I have a procedure that (a) does some IO, (b) constructs a lookup table, and (c) returns an IO action that uses the lookup table. But when compiled with -O, GHC (version 6.12.1) inlines the construction the lookup table, so that it is reevaluated for every call of the IO action.

Example:

module Main where
import Data.Array
import Data.IORef
import Control.Monad

makeAction getX getY sumRef = do
    x <- getX
    let a = listArray (0, 1000) [x ..]
    return $ do
        y <- getY
        modifyIORef sumRef (\sum -> sum + a ! y)

main = do
    sumRef <- newIORef 0
    action <- makeAction getX g开发者_如何学GoetY sumRef
    replicateM_ 100000 action
    n <- readIORef sumRef
    putStrLn (show n)
    where
    getX = return (1 :: Int)
    getY = return 0

Is this issue well-known enough to have a standard GHC-foolproof workaround - or how would you adjust the program so that a isn't repeatedly being allocated?


The easiest workaround is to force evaluation by using strictness annotations.

{-# LANGUAGE BangPatterns #-}

Then force allocation by simply making a strict using a ! ("bang").

    let !a = listArray (0, 1000) [x ..]

Alternatively, if you are working in the IO monad, strictness annotations may not always help. To force evaluation of an expression before some IO action is run, you can use evaluate. For example:

    let a = listArray (0, 1000) [x ..]
    evaluate a


Try forcing a when constructing the monadic value to return:

makeAction getX getY sumRef = do
    x <- getX
    let a = listArray (0, 1000) [x ..]
    return $ a `seq` do
        y <- getY
        modifyIORef sumRef (\sum -> sum + a ! y)
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号