When I have following:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int val1,val2;
printf("Enter the first value");
scanf("%d",val1);
scanf("%d",&val2);
int c;
c=val1 + val2;
printf(" the value is : %d", c);
return 0; // 0 means no error
}
I get error undeclared identifier c. Also, syntax error. missing ; before type.
However, if I change above to following error disappears. Please help
#include "stdafx.h"
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int val1,val2,c;
printf("Enter the first value");
scanf("%d",&val1);
scanf("%d",&val2);
c=val1 + val2;
printf(" the value is : %d", c);
r开发者_运维知识库eturn 0; // 0 means no error
}
I am running C in VS 2010.
In C, at least back in the old days, variable declarations have to come at the top of the block. C++ is different in that regard.
edit — apparently C99 is different from C90 in this respect (C99 being essentially the same as C++ on this issue).
Objects may only be declared at the top of a statement block in ISO C90. You can therefore do this:
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int val1,val2;
printf("Enter the first value");
scanf("%d",val1);
scanf("%d",&val2);
// New statement block
{
int c;
c=val1 + val2;
printf(" the value is : %d", c);
}
return 0; // 0 means no error
}
Though it would perhaps be unusual to do so. Contrary to somewhat popular belief, the start of a function is not the only place you can declare an automatic variable. It is more common, rather than creating a dummy block, to use existing statement blocks introduced as part of an if
or for
construct for example.
It is useful to enclose case
blocks in { ... }, even though not normally necessary, so that you can introduce temporary case specific variables:
switch( x )
{
case SOMETHING :
{
int case_local = 0 ;
}
break ;
...
}
Microsoft decided against supporting newer revisions of the C language, so you can't mix code and declarations. With MSVC, you're basically stuck with C90, although some selected features (eg long long
, restrict
) are supported.
My recommendation would be to either switch to C++ or use a different compiler like the MinGW edition of GCC.
One other observation. scanf() wants the ADDRESS of the destination, not it's value.
in the top example you are omitting the & in scanf("%d",val1); . In the bottom example it is included scanf("%d",&val1);
"val1" vs "&val1"
Shouldn't change the problem with the variable 'c', but probably causing a syntax error somewhere?
In C90, local variables must all be declared at the beginning of a function block.
精彩评论