ASP.NET MVC 3 HtmlHelper Exception does not recognize ModelMetadata on inherited interface

After upgrading to MVC 3 RTM I get an exception where it previously worked.

Here is the scenario. I have several objects that use the same underlying inte开发者_如何学运维rfaces IActivity and IOwned.

IActivity implements IOwned (another interface)

public interface IActivity:IOwned {...}

public interface IOwned 
{
    int? AuthorId {get;set;}
}

I have a partial view that uses IActivity for reuse from other concrete partials.

Here is the definition of the Activity Partial.

<%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<IActivity>" %>
<%: Html.HiddenFor(item => item.AuthorId) %>

However, it throws an exception. It can not find AuthorId in the ModelMetadata.

I am guessing that in the previous version it looked at the interfaces IActivity implemented.

Any ideas, suggestions, short of duplicating similar interfaces everywhere?

Copied the stack trace below.

[ArgumentException: The property IActivity.AuthorId could not be found.]
   System.Web.Mvc.AssociatedMetadataProvider.GetMetadataForProperty(Func`1 modelAccessor, Type containerType, String propertyName) +498313
   System.Web.Mvc.ModelMetadata.GetMetadataFromProvider(Func`1 modelAccessor, Type modelType, String propertyName, Type containerType) +101
   System.Web.Mvc.ModelMetadata.FromLambdaExpression(Expression`1 expression, ViewDataDictionary`1 viewData) +393
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.InputExtensions.HiddenFor(HtmlHelper`1 htmlHelper, Expression`1 expression, IDictionary`2 htmlAttributes) +57
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.InputExtensions.HiddenFor(HtmlHelper`1 htmlHelper, Expression`1 expression) +51
   ASP.views_shared_activity_ascx.__Render__control1(HtmlTextWriter __w, Control parameterContainer) in c:\Users\...\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\ngen\trunk\...\Views\Shared\Activity.ascx:3
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +109
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +8
   System.Web.UI.Control.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +10
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +100
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +208
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +8
   System.Web.UI.Page.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +43
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +100
   System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25
   System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3060

---

From the MVC team:

Unfortunately, the code was actually exploiting a bug that was fixed, where the container of an expression for ModelMetadata purposes was inadvertently set to the declaring type instead of the containing type. This bug had to be fixed because of the needs of virtual properties and validation/model metadata.

Having interface-based models is not something we encourage (nor, given the limitations imposed by the bug fix, can realistically support). Switching to abstract base classes would fix the issue.

---

There has been a breaking change/bug in ASP.NET MVC 3 in the System.Web.Mvc.ModelMetadata. FromLambdaExpression method which explains the exception you are getting:

ASP.NET MVC 2.0:

...
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
{
    MemberExpression body = (MemberExpression) expression.Body;
    propertyName = (body.Member is PropertyInfo) ? body.Member.Name : null;
    containerType = body.Member.DeclaringType;
    flag = true;
    break;
}
...

ASP.NET MVC 3.0

...
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
{
    MemberExpression body = (MemberExpression) expression.Body;
    propertyName = (body.Member is PropertyInfo) ? body.Member.Name : null;
    containerType = body.Expression.Type;
    flag = true;
    break;
}
...

Notice how the containerType variable is assigned a different value. So in your case in ASP.NET MVC 2.0 it was assigned the value of IOwned which is the correct declaring type of the AuthorId property whereas in ASP.NET MVC 3.0 it is assigned to IActivity and later when the framework tries to find the property it crashes.

That's the cause. As far as the resolution is concerned I would wait for some official statement from Microsoft. I can't find any relevant information about this in the Release Notes document. Is it a bug or some feature which needs to be workarounded here?

For now you could either use the non-strongly typed Html.Hidden("AuthorId") helper or specify IOwned as type for your control (I know both suck).

---

With thanks to Burcephal, whos answer pointed me in the right direction

You can create a MetaDataProvider which will get around this issue, the code here adds to the code in the base class checking for the property on implemented interfaces of a model which is itself an interface.

public class MyMetadataProvider
    : EmptyModelMetadataProvider {

    public override ModelMetadata GetMetadataForProperty(
        Func<object> modelAccessor, Type containerType, string propertyName) {

        if (containerType == null) {
            throw new ArgumentNullException("containerType");
        }
        if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(propertyName)) {
            throw new ArgumentException(
                "The property &apos;{0}&apos; cannot be null or empty", "propertyName");
        }

        var property = GetTypeDescriptor(containerType)
            .GetProperties().Find(propertyName, true);
        if (property == null
            && containerType.IsInterface) {
            property = (from t in containerType.GetInterfaces()
                        let p = GetTypeDescriptor(t).GetProperties()
                            .Find(propertyName, true)
                        where p != null
                        select p
                        ).FirstOrDefault();
        }

        if (property == null) {
            throw new ArgumentException(
                String.Format(
                    CultureInfo.CurrentCulture,
                    "The property {0}.{1} could not be found",
                    containerType.FullName, propertyName));
        }

        return GetMetadataForProperty(modelAccessor, containerType, property);
    }
}

and as above, set your provider the global.asax Application_Start

ModelMetadataProviders.Current = new MyMetaDataProvider();

---

f you are interrested, I have implemented a little work around for it in my app. As I was going through the MVC source code, I found that the FromLambdaExpression method named below will be calling the MetaDataProvider which is an overridable singleton. So we could just implement that class that will actually try the inhereted intefaces if the first one does not work. It will also go up the tree of intefaces.

public class MyMetaDataProvider : EmptyModelMetadataProvider
{
    public override ModelMetadata GetMetadataForProperty(Func<object> modelAccessor, Type containerType, string propertyName)
    {
        try
        {
            return base.GetMetadataForProperty(modelAccessor, containerType, propertyName);
        }
         catch(Exception ex)
        {
            //Try to go up to type tree
            var types = containerType.GetInterfaces();              
            foreach (var container in types)
            {
                if (container.GetProperty(propertyName) != null)
                {
                    try
                    {
                        return GetMetadataForProperty(modelAccessor, container, propertyName);
                    }
                    catch
                    {
                        //This interface did not work
                    }
                }
            }               
            //If nothing works, then throw the exception
            throw ex;
        }              
    }
}

and then, just cange the implementation of the MetaDataProvider in the global.asax Application_Start()

ModelMetadataProviders.Current = new MyMetaDataProvider();

It is not the best code ever, but it does the job.

---

Try using typecast. It works for my project although resharper highlights it as redundant.

For your code the solution would be

<%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<IActivity>" %>
<%: Html.HiddenFor(item => ((IOwned)item).AuthorId) %>

---

Furthering Anthony Johnston's answer, you might find that you get exceptions when using DataAnnotations, as the AssociatedValidatorProvider.GetValidatorsForProperty() method will try to use the inheriting interface as the container type rather than the base one and therefore fail to find the property again.

This is the reflected code from the GetValidatorsForProperty method (it is the second line which causes the propertyDescriptor variable to be null and thus the exception to be thrown) :

private IEnumerable<ModelValidator> GetValidatorsForProperty(ModelMetadata metadata, ControllerContext context)
{
    ICustomTypeDescriptor typeDescriptor = this.GetTypeDescriptor(metadata.ContainerType);
    PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor = typeDescriptor.GetProperties().Find(metadata.PropertyName, true);
    if (propertyDescriptor != null)
    {
        return this.GetValidators(metadata, context, propertyDescriptor.Attributes.OfType<Attribute>());
    }
    else
    {
        object[] fullName = new object[] { metadata.ContainerType.FullName, metadata.PropertyName };
        throw new ArgumentException(string.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture, MvcResources.Common_PropertyNotFound, fullName), "metadata");
    }
}

If so, I believe that the following code may help, as it makes sure that the ContainerType is set to the type which the property is on, not the type of the view model.

Disclaimer: It seems to work fine, but I have not fully tested it yet so it might have undesired effects! I also understand it is not written perfectly, but I was trying to keep the format similar to the previous answer for ease of comparison. :)

public class MyMetadataProvider : DataAnnotationsModelMetadataProvider
{
    public override ModelMetadata GetMetadataForProperty(
        Func<object> modelAccessor, Type containerType, string propertyName)
    {

        if (containerType == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException("containerType");
        }
        if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(propertyName))
        {
            throw new ArgumentException(
                "The property &apos;{0}&apos; cannot be null or empty", "propertyName");
        }

        var containerTypeToUse = containerType;

        var property = GetTypeDescriptor(containerType)
            .GetProperties().Find(propertyName, true);
        if (property == null
            && containerType.IsInterface)
        {

            var foundProperty = (from t in containerType.GetInterfaces()
                        let p = GetTypeDescriptor(t).GetProperties()
                            .Find(propertyName, true)
                        where p != null
                        select (new Tuple<System.ComponentModel.PropertyDescriptor, Type>(p, t))
                        ).FirstOrDefault();

            if (foundProperty != null)
            {
                property = foundProperty.Item1;
                containerTypeToUse = foundProperty.Item2;
            }
        }


        if (property == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException(
                String.Format(
                    CultureInfo.CurrentCulture,
                    "The property {0}.{1} could not be found",
                    containerType.FullName, propertyName));
        }

        return GetMetadataForProperty(modelAccessor, containerTypeToUse, property);
    }
}