Is there a simple way to flatten a list while retaining the original types of list constituents?.. Is there a way to programmatically construct a flattened list out of different constituent types?..
For instance, I want to create a simple wrapper for functions like png(filename,width,height)
that would take device name, file name, and a list of options. The naive approach would be something like
my.wrapper <- function(dev,name,opts) { do.call(dev,c(filename=name,opts)) }
or similar code with unlist(list(...))
. This doesn't work because opts
gets coerced to character, and the resulting call is e.g. png(filename,width="500",height="500")
.
If there's no straightforward way to create heterogeneous lists like that, is there a standard idiomatic way to splice arguments into functions without naming them explicitly (e.g. do.call(dev,list(filename=name,width=opts["width"])
)?
-- Edit --
Gavin Simpson answered both questions below in his discussion about constructing wrapper functions. Let me give a summary of the answer to the title question:
It is possible to construct a list with c()
provided at least one of the arguments to c()
is a list. To wit:
> foo <- c("a","b"); bar <- 1:3
> c(foo,bar)
[1] "a" "b" "1" "2" "3"
> typeof(c(foo,bar))
[1] "character" ## note that the result is not a list and that coercion occurred
> c(list(foo),list(bar)) ## try also c(foo,list(bar))
[[1]] [1] "a" "b"
[[2]] [1] 1 2 3
> typeof(c(foo,list(bar)))
[1] "list" ## now 开发者_C百科the result is a list, so no need to coerce to same type
> c(as.list(foo),as.list(bar)) ## this creates a flattened list, as desired
[[1]] [1] "a"
[[2]] [1] "b"
[[3]] [1] 1
[[4]] [1] 2
[[5]] [1] 3
No, as unlist
and c
(when applied to atomic vectors of different types) are creating an atomic vector and by definition they must be of a single type. A list in R is the most generic of vectors and you can use it, in fact the "args"
argument of do.call
asks for a list and you are supplying an atomic vector (through your use of c()
).
Why use do.call
when all you are doing is generating a new device? If all you want is a wrapper to png
that sets some defaults so you don't have to type all these out each time you want to use a png
device, then you are being too complicated. Something like this will suffice:
my.png <- function(name, height = 500, width = 500, ...) {
png(filename = name, height = height, width = width, ...)
}
If you want a more general wrapper, then something like:
my.wrapper <- function(dev, name, ...) {
dev(filename = name, ...)
}
should suffice. You would use it like:
my.wrapper(png, "my_png.png", height = 500, width = 200, pointsize = 12)
or
my.wrapper(pdf, "my_pdf.pdf", height = 8, width = 6, version = "1.4")
If you want to work with ...
, you can, e.g.:
my.wrapper2 <- function(dev, name, ...) {
dotargs <- list(...)
writeLines("my.wrapper2, called with the following extra arguments:")
print(dotargs)
## do nothing now...
}
Which gives:
> my.wrapper2(pdf, "foo.pdf", height = 10, width = 5, pointsize = 8,
+ version = "1.3")
my.wrapper2, called with the following extra arguments:
$height
[1] 10
$width
[1] 5
$pointsize
[1] 8
$version
[1] "1.3"
So then you can programatically pull out the arguments you want and o what you want with them.
Something else that just occurred to me that might be of use is that you can use c
to concatenate extra components on to lists:
> c(filename = "name", list(height = 500, width = 500))
$filename
[1] "name"
$height
[1] 500
$width
[1] 500
So if you really wanted to apply do.call
to a set of arguments, then
my.wrapper3 <- function(dev, name, ...) {
dotargs <- list(...)
## concatenate with name
callArgs <- c(filename = name, dotargs)
## use do.call
do.call(dev, args = callArgs)
}
But that can be more easily achieved with my.wrapper
above.
dev <- "png"
filename <- "foo.png"
width <- 480
height <- 480
opts <- c(width=width, height=height)
my.wrapper <- function(dev,name,opts) {
name <- list(filename=name)
do.call(dev, c(name, opts))
}
my.wrapper(dev, filename, opts)
Note that this will work only if opts
is a named vector, as do.call
needs a list with named entries.
I think the reason you have to add that extra step is that c()
does different things depending on the types of its argument - if you want a list, one of the arguments to it has to be a list, otherwise it does the necessary type conversion on all its arguments so that it can create a vector.
精彩评论