I found this question which gives me the ability to check if a string contains a Chinese character. I'开发者_运维技巧m not sure if the unicode ranges are correct but they seem to return false for Japanese and Korean and true for Chinese.

What it doesn't do is tell if the character is traditional or simplified Chinese. How would you go about finding this out?

---

update

Q: How can I recognize from the 32 bit value of a Unicode character if this is a Chinese, Korean or Japanese character?

http://unicode.org/faq/han_cjk.html

Their argument that the characters regardless of their shape have the same meaning and therefore should be represented by the same code. Well, it's not meaningless to me because I am analyzing individual characters which doesn't work with their solution:

A better solution is to look at the text as a whole: if there's a fair amount of kana, it's probably Japanese, and if there's a fair amount of hangul, it's probably Korean.

---

As already stated, you can't reliably detect the script style from a single character, but it is possible for a sufficiently long sample of text. See https://github.com/jpatokal/script_detector for a Ruby gem that does the job, and Simplified Chinese Unicode table for a general discussion.

---

It is possible for some characters. The Traditional and Simplified character sets overlap, so you have basically three sets of characters:

1. Characters that are traditional only.
2. Characters that are simplified only.
3. Characters that have been left untouched, and are available in both.

Take the character 面 for instance. It belongs both to #2 and #3... As a simplified character, it stands for 面 and 麵, face and noodles. Whereas 麵 is a traditional character only. So in the Unihan database, 麵 has a kSimplifiedVariant, which points to 面. So you can deduct that it is a traditional character only.

But 面 also has a kTraditionalVariant, which points to 麵. This is where the system breaks: if you use this data to deduct that 面 is a simplified character only, you'd be wrong...

On the other hand, 韩 has a kTraditionalVariant, pointing to 韓, and these two are a "real" Simplified/Traditional pair. But nothing in the Unihan database differentiates cases like 韓/韩 from cases like 麵/面.

---

As I think you've discovered, you can't. Simplified and traditional are just two styles of writing the same characters - it's like the difference between Roman and Gothic script for European languages.