I'm wondering if these two expressions are equivalent, because if they are, it would make this much easier.
$('div', this).filter(':not(.trigger)')...
$('div:not([class*=trigger])', this)...
开发者_StackOverflow
(this
providing a context under which to look for the specified div
)
No.
Version 1 takes all divs without the class trigger.
Version 2 takes all the divs where the attribute class contains the text trigger. This means a div with the class mytrigger will be a match.
Selectors
EDIT
With your updated question this would be the equivalent to the first version.
$('div:not(.trigger)', this)
They're not essentially the same. The second also filters out all div's which have a class which contains "trigger" in the name, thus also e.g. "anothertrigger" and "triggerfoo".
You can also use
$('div:not(.trigger)', this)...
which is imho much clearer.
精彩评论