Is it possible?
typedef struct {
l开发者_StackOverflow中文版istLink *next;
listLink *prev;
void *data;
} listLink;
Yes, with this syntaxis
struct list {
int value;
struct list *next;
};
or
typedef struct list
{
int value;
struct list *next;
} list;
Yes, but the typedef doesn't happen until later in the statement so you need to give the struct itself a name. E.g.
struct listLink {
struct listLink *next;
struct listLink *prev;
void *data;
};
And you can wrap that in a typedef if you don't want to have to declare each instance as struct listLink <whatever>
.
I prefer this version:
typedef struct listLink listLink ;
struct listLink{
listLink *next;
listLink *prev;
void *data;
} ;
It clearly separates the struct from and members and variables.
Using the same name for both struct and typedef, struct listLink, listLink
, is not an issue since they have separate namespaces.
This possible with th osgrx given syntax. Plus, this is called a linked list: http://www.ehow.com/how_2056292_create-linked-list-c.html
Choose a name, then use typedef to define it. Every linked list will need a structure, even if it only has one variable:
typedef struct product_data PRODUCT_DATA;
Define the structure. The last element should be a pointer to the type you just defined, and named "next":
struct product_data {
int product_code;
int product_size;
PRODUCT_DATA *next;
};
精彩评论