开发者

what does comma in echo statement signify?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-29 08:08 出处:网络
I am trying to echo a string from a Recursive function: echo \"<li>\", $开发者_JS百科node, recurse($arr), \"</li>\";

I am trying to echo a string from a Recursive function:

echo "<li>", $开发者_JS百科node, recurse($arr), "</li>";

and

echo "<li>" . $node . recurse($arr) . "</li>";

function writeList($tree)
{
    if($tree == null) return;
    echo "<ul>";
    foreach($tree as $node=>$children) {
        echo "<li>", $node, writeList($children) , "</li>";
    }
    echo "</ul>";
}

$tree is a tree-like structure, as can be found in this question (form2)

And, I can notice that the output from the two is different.

Can someone tell me the difference in using , and . in general, and particularly, in this example?

EDIT: what if rather than echoing the strings, I want to store the string generated from this function in a variable. I am, particularly, interested in the output received from the first echo statement.

EDIT: I am feeding this array:

array
  3 => 
    array
      4 => 
        array
          7 => null
          8 => 
            array
              9 => null
      5 => null
  6 => null

The outputs I am getting is:

(from first echo statement)

<ul><li>3<ul><li>4<ul><li>7</li><li>8<ul><li>9</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>5</li></ul></li><li>6</li></ul>

(from second echo statement)

<ul><ul><ul><li>7</li><ul><li>9</li></ul><li>8</li></ul><li>4</li><li>5</li></ul><li>3</li><li>6</li></ul>


EDIT: OK, I get it. The culprit is your writeList() function. There is a secondary echo inside that function.

When you do this:

echo "<li>", $node, writeList($arr), "</li>";

Each part is evaluated first and then printed out. It is equivalent to:

echo "<li>";
echo $node;
echo writeList($arr);
echo "</li>";

But when you do this:

echo "<li>" . $node . writeList($arr) . "</li>";

The entire string is constructed using the concatenation operators . first, then printed out. This means writeList($arr) is called first during the construction of the string, then the outer echo is called.

To avoid this problem, don't echo anything within your function calls. Build strings using the concatenation operator and then return them so that your outer echo can print them.


what if rather than echoing the strings, I want to store the string generated from this function in a variable. I am, particularly, interested in the output received from the first echo statement.

Use output buffering.

ob_start();
echo "<li>", $node, writeList($arr), "</li>";
$out = ob_get_clean();

But for that particular statement, why not just concatenate instead?

$out = "<li>" . $node . writeList($arr) . "</li>";


echo is a language construct and can accept multiple arguments separated by a comma. The effect is identical to a concatenated string.

The output shouldn't be different - I can't think of an instance where it could be.

Edit: Ah, but it is. That is because your function echo()es stuff. In the first instance, <li> and $node get output; then the function's output comes.

I would have WriteList simply return values recursively.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消