Okay... first off I'm just going to explain something about what the architecture I'm after looks like.
I am trying to implement a Stats Manager for my Stats objects. This stats manager is designed using templates (see declaration in the pic).The StatMgr holds a map (not STL) that maps a string implementation to a smart pointer (which is also a template), ARef. The specific sub-classes of StatMgr statically declare the template class of their parent StatMgr on construction (see LStatMgr and RStatMgr), and so themselves are not template classes.
This allows me to do things like:LStatMgr myLStatMgr(10);
if(myLStatMgr.remove(acKey))
cout << "Remove was good" << endl;
//No need to delete :)
OR
ARef<LStat> oLStat = NULL;
myLStatMgr.getNextStat(acKey,oLStat);
if(oLStat != NULL)
oLStat->doSomethingLStatLike();
However that was before mister linker and madam compiler decided to join forces and thwart my attempts at progress (I still have to test the functionality and memory use!).
As it stands I have the following error and warning per stat class:.\StatsMgr.cpp(740) : warning C4661: 'void StatsMgr::vPrint()' : no suitable definition provided for explicit template instantiation request
.\StatsMgr.cpp(740) : warning C4661: 'void StatsMgr::vPrint()' : no suitable definition provided for explicit template instantiation request .\StatsMgr.cpp(104) : error C2084: function 'StatsMgr::StatsMgr(const enum doCollect,const int)' already has a body .\StatsMgr.cpp(104) : error C2084: function 'StatsMgr::StatsMgr(const enum doCollect,const int)' already has a body
Now regarding the warnings :: at line 740 there are delarations as so:
template class StatsMgr<LStat>;
template class StatsMgr<RStat>;
I added this because if I don't do that then I end up with a mess of linker errors (see them below). However there ARE declarations and implementat开发者_JS百科ions of vPrint() in all of the Stat subclasses!
Regarding the errors: The base class "StatsMgr" has a defined COTR, as do the subclasses (LStatMgr & RStatMgr). Why does the inheritance not simply sort this out? Obviously this is something to do with the explicit template instances at the end of the CPP but I cannot understand what exactly is going on. Below is from StatsMgr.cpptemplate<class type>
StatsMgr<type>::StatsMgr(const doCollect eOption, const int nListSize) :
oMyMap(wHashString, nListSize), oMyMapIter(oStatsList)
{
m_eCollectionOption = eOption;
}
Below is from LStatMgr.cpp
LStatMgr::LStatMgr(const doCollect eOption, const int nListSize) :
StatsMgr<LStat> (eOption, nListSize)
{
}
I tried substituting
class LStatMgr;
class RStatMgr;
for the template declarations and this gets passed the compile errors but then the linker cannot find any non-overridden functions. For example if I have a function in StatMgr called "getNextStat()" and override that in RStatMgr but not in LStatMgr, then the linker complains about that. Why is inheritance not covering this situation?
It makes me sad. I may have to fall back to composition (which should be preferred, but not in this situation). By the way... I am compiling with MSVC++ 4.1 (!!!), so I understand if you cannot duplicate, but please help. Thanks, Dennis. (sorry about the very long post)Put template code directly in the header, not in a separate CPP file.
See this previous question for background.
EDIT: btw I see you are on a very old compiler - this problem may be insurmountable, even VC6 was sketchy for templates.
精彩评论