Just a question on standards.
I've created a wrapper class for PHP session management, that helps automatically organize session data based on certain internal modules accessing it. It's designed as a singleton, using a getInstance()
method to instan开发者_如何学Gotiate, since there will only be a single session at a given time. Also, this came as a benefit to me, as I am able to prevent instantiation of the session object in the (albeit probably limited) chance that session_start()
fails. As for an example:
public static function getInstance(){
if(!self::$_instance || !session_id()){
if(session_start()){
self::$_instance = new self(session_id());
}else{
return;
}
}
return self::$_instance;
}
My question is; although the use of a gateway getInstance()
method works naturally here for a few reasons, is it common/good practice to implement public static getInstance()
or create()
methods in classes to control object creation if the object is reliant on external conditions?
I just find myself sticking to a convention of providing getInstance()
in the case of singletons, and create()
in the case of multiple instance objects.
TL;DR: I keep using getInstance()
and create()
methods to control all object instantiation. Am I doing it wrong?
EDIT: Refining my question a bit; Aside from using getInstance()
for singletons, is my constructor wrapping with create()
methods serving less purpose and more leaning towards bad convention? Should I be throwing Exceptions from the true constructor, or continue returning false from a create()
?
Singletons are generally considered "bad"; see this section here for a flame war on the topic.
That said, using factory methods or factory classes to create objects is generally considered good, so you're fine there :)
I personally use the symfony dependency injection component (can be installed in any project without using the symfony framework) to simplify dependency injection and avoid singletons where it seems appropriate.
I do still use some singletons, where it makes sense to me; loggers and factory objects, for example, seem to naturally be single to me, so I make them that way. The idea is that global functionality (e.g. a factory) is fine, but global state is bad, I believe.
With regards to your amended question on whether to throw an Exception or whether to return false from your create() call; it depends on whether your application can continue successfully without the created object if not. If, for example, you were creating a database connection that is necessary to create a page, then throw an Exception. If you're doing something less essential, return false and continue on your merry way :)
getInstance()
is used ALL over the place in the Zend Framework, which is my goto for standards and conventions in code.
as for the create(), what about using the magic __construct
method so that when you do new Blah()
it calls the __construct
method for that class?
You should user __construct
method then using create method.
As __construct
is called by itself you can do initialization and other things in constructor .
Another benefit is you can forget to call create() method and your object can be in inconsistent state
精彩评论