开发者

Pattern matching equivalent variables in Haskell, like in Prolog

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-23 15:41 出处:网络
In prolog, we can do something like the following: myFunction a (a:xs) = ... This is, when the 1st argument of myFunction is the same as the first item of the list that\'s in the 2nd argument, this

In prolog, we can do something like the following:

myFunction a (a:xs) = ...

This is, when the 1st argument of myFunction is the same as the first item of the list that's in the 2nd argument, this function will evaluate to ....

My question now is... how to accomplish a similar thing in Haskell? I have the idea that Prolog's Pattern Matching is more expressive than Haskell's. I've been trying to code that in Haskell and I'm having trouble -- either I 开发者_StackOverflow中文版am using invalid syntax or the above trick will simply not do.


Haskell doesn't do this kind of "variable matching". You'll have to explicitly put a guard on:

myFunction a (x:xs)
    | x == a = ...


Haskell doesn't do unification of variables, as Prolog does. As the Haskell 98 report says,

The set of patterns corresponding to each match must be linear---no variable is allowed to appear more than once in the entire set.

You can of course name the variables, and state they must also be equal:

f a (b:_) | a == b = ...

Interestingly, Agda does let information flow across patterns like this, and introduces a special notation f x (.x:_) to say that this x must be that x.


In Haskell, you can't do implicit comparisons like this in a pattern match. Instead, you'll need to add a guard which explicitly does the comparison, like so:

myFunction a (b:xs) | a == b = ...
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消