I recently stumbled into this this C++/Lua error
int function_for_lua( lua_State* L )
{
std::string s("Trouble coming!");
/* ... */
return luaL_error(L,"something went wrong");
}
The error is that luaL_error
use longjmp
, so the stack is never unwound and 开发者_运维技巧s
is never destructed, leaking memory. There are a few more Lua API's that fail to unwind the stack.
One obvious solution is to compile Lua in C++ mode with exceptions. I, however, cannot as Luabind needs the standard C ABI.
My current thought is to write my own functions that mimic the troublesome parts of the Lua API:
// just a heads up this is valid c++. It's called a function try/catch.
int function_for_lua( lua_State* L )
try
{
/* code that may throw Lua_error */
}
catch( Lua_error& e )
{
luaL_error(L,e.what());
}
So my question: Is function_for_lua
's stack properly unwound. Can something go wrong?
If I understand correctly, with Luabind
functions that throw exceptions are properly caught and translated anyway. (See reference.)
So whenever you need to indicate an error, just throw a standard exception:
void function_for_lua( lua_State* L )
{
std::string s("Trouble coming!");
/* ... */
// translated into lua error
throw std::runtime_error("something went wrong");
}
Disclaimer: I've never used Lubind.
精彩评论