开发者

Header-only libraries and multiple definition errors

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-21 00:56 出处:网络
I want to write a library that to use, you only need to include one header file. However, if you have multip开发者_开发百科le source files and include the header in both, you\'ll get multiple definiti

I want to write a library that to use, you only need to include one header file. However, if you have multip开发者_开发百科le source files and include the header in both, you'll get multiple definition errors, because the library is both declared and defined in the header. I have seen header-only libraries, in Boost I think. How did they do that?


Declare your functions inline, and put them in a namespace so you don't collide:

namespace fancy_schmancy
{
  inline void my_fn()
  {
    // magic happens
  }
};


The main reason why Boost is largely header-only is because it's heavily template oriented. Templates generally get a pass from the one definition rule. In fact to effectively use templates, you must have the definition visible in any translation unit that uses the template.

Another way around the one definition rule (ODR) is to use inline functions. Actually, getting a free-pass from the ODR is what inline really does - the fact that it might inline the function is really more of an optional side-effect.

A final option (but probably not as good) is to make your functions static. This may lead to code bloat if the linker isn't able to figure out that all those function instances are really the same. But I mention it for completeness. Note that compilers will often inline static functions even if they aren't marked as inline.


Boost uses header-only libraries a lot because like the STL, it's mostly built using class and function templates, which are almost always header-only.

If you are not writing templates I would avoid including code in your header files - it's more trouble than it's worth. Make this a plain old static library.


There are many truly header-only Boost libraries, but they tend to be very simple (and/or only templates). The bigger libraries accomplish the same effect through some trickery: they have "automatic linking" (you'll see this term used here). They essentially have a bunch of preprocessor directives in the headers that figure out the appropriate lib file for your platform and use a #pragma to instruct the linker to link it in. So you don't have to explicitly link it, but it is still being linked.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消