I have a simple linq query that unionizes two tables that implement the same interface.
For this example, lets say IAnimal.
var q = (from d in db.Dogs
where d.AnimalID = PetID
select d.Name)
.Union
(from c in db.Cats
where c.AnimalID = PetID
select c.Name)
So if the dog portion has no members, 开发者_如何学编程q gets assigned {"", {whatever is in cat}}. Is there a way to remove that empty record without doing .Where(x=>x!="" | x!= String.Empty)
after the query?
I know its not that big of a deal, but it seems like there should be a better way?
How is that not a good way? What is wrong with it?
Well.. there is one thing wrong with it. If should be:
.Where(x => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(x))
If you are using Entity Framework or some other LINQ provider which can't handle IsNullOrEMpty then the code should be:
.Where(x => x != null && x != "")
Your code using |
instead of &&
and checks against the empty string twice but never null.
精彩评论