Java, multiple threads with only one executing at a time

I am working on an assignment and have to create two classes, one represents a person, and the other representing a bridge. Only one person can be "crossing" the bridge at any one time, but there could be people waiting to cross

I easily implemented this with multi-threading allowing for multiple people to cross at once, but I am having issues when changing it to allow only one thread to run...

M开发者_开发知识库y main problem is the class design they want, I have to begin the threads within the person class, but the bridge class needs to be able to wait and notify them to start/stop

Any ideas how I can do this?

---

You probably want to read up on wait and notify. There are tutorials with a google search.

But after you understand them a bit, you want to have the person objects call wait. Then you want the bridge object to call notify. When a person object returns from wait, it is their turn to cross (as I understand your problem.) When the person crosses, the bridge object would call notify again.

Make sure you synchronize correctly. The tutorials should help.

Read this question as well: How to use wait and notify in Java?

---

Lock an object like this:

// Bridge.java

public class Bridge {
private Object _mutex = new Object();

    public void cross(Person p)
        synchronized(_mutex) { 
             // code goes here
        }     
    }
}

That is one, probably the easiest, method..

EDIT:

even easier:

public class Bridge {
    public synchronized void cross(Person p)
    {
        // code goes here
    }
}

---

I believe what the assignment is asking you to do is to use (or implement) a mutex for access to the shared resource, aka the bridge. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutex

---

Try java.util.concurrent:

http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Executors.html#newSingleThreadExecutor%28%29

This class wil produce an ExecutorService, where you can submit yout "Persons". And the Jobes are queued, one Person will cross at time.