Generic structs in unions

I'm trying to make a generic vector class. While I can do something like this:

struct vector3 {
  union {
    struct {
      float x;
      float y;
      float z;
    };
    float v[3];
  };
};

I cannot do this:

template<int N, typename S, typename T = double>
class vec {
    union {
        T data[N];
        S;
    };
};

struct XY { REAL x, y; };
typedef vec<2, XY, REAL> Vector2;

because "S does not declare anything."

Is there any way to insert a generic template parameter as a member of a union? Essentially, I want to "inject" x and y fields into the vec class. Is there a better way of doi开发者_StackOverflow中文版ng this?

---

You need to name the member:

template<int N, typename S, typename T = double>
class vec {
    union {
        T data[N];
        S you_need_to_have_a_member_name_here;
    };
};

struct XY { REAL x, y; };
typedef vec<2, XY, REAL> Vector2;

But more importantly, what exactly are you trying to accomplish? If you want a heterogeneous container, you should do it via polymorphism. If you want a generic vector, use std::vector.

Also, you can't use templates to provide member names, only member types. What the above gets you will still be accessed as Vector2::you_need_to_have_a_member_name_here.x and Vector2::you_need_to_have_a_member_name_here.y.

edit1

OK, for what you're doing there's no really easy way. But there's a somewhat easy way (although it's pure evil).

#define Vec(D, X) struct Vector ## D { \
  X;  \
};

Vec(2, int x, y)
Vec(3, int x, y, z)
Vec(4, int w, x, y, z)
Vec(5, int v, w, x, y, z)

It's not pretty, safe, or sane, but it'll work. This is only if you really need specific member names. In general, there are safer ways if you can give up that requirement.

---

I think you need to implement tuple? That is what I understand from generic vector (I'm assuming this is vector space's vector, not std::vector). C++0x has this feature. Not sure which compiler implements it.