开发者

C# Linq Custom Sort

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-19 00:06 出处:网络
I have a query in linqtosql that returns a LabelNumber: var q = from list in db.Lists select list.LabelNumber;

I have a query in linqtosql that returns a LabelNumber:

var q = from list in db.Lists
        select list.LabelNumber;

var q then becomes an IEnumerable<string> with elements like this:

{"1","2","2.A","2.B","3","3.A","3.B"}

I basically want to order the elements as they appear above, but I can't use the OrderBy(x=>x.LabelNumber) because "10" would get placed after "1" and before "2".

I assume I have to write a custom comparator function, but how do I do this with linq?

Edit: I think all of the answers below will work, but one caveat must be added to all responses.

If you are using Linq2SQL you cannot use array indexes within the query. To overcome this, you should have two queries. One that reads from SQL. The second does the ordering:

var q = from list in db.Lists
            select list.LabelNumber;

var q2 = q.AsEnumerable()
          .OrderBy(x => int.Parse(x.LabelNumber.Split('.')[0]))
          .ThenBy(x => x.Number
                        .Contains(".") ? 
                              x.LabelNumber.Split('.')[1].ToString() 
           开发者_JS百科                   : 
                              string.Empty);


OrderBy(x=>x.LabelNumber, new AlphanumComparator())

where AlphanumComparator is the excellent Alphanum natural sort algorithm by David Koelle. No need to reinvent the wheel.

If you're gonna use the C# version change it to:

AlphanumComparator : IComparer<string>

and

public int Compare(string x, string y)


You probably don't have to write a custom comparer. If all your labels are in the form number.letter, you could use this.

var query = from list in db.Lists
            let split = list.LabelNumber.Split('.')
            let order = split.Length == 1
                ? new { a = int.Parse(split[0]), b = String.Empty }
                : new { a = int.Parse(split[0]), b = split[1] }
            orderby order.a, order.b
            select list.LabelNumber;

If you need more control, you could always convert the sortby fields (a and b) to the appropriate types rather than ints and strings.


If this is LINQ-to-SQL, this actually won't work since some methods used here are not supported. Here's a LINQ-to-SQL friendly version. It won't yield the prettiest query, but it will work.

var query = from list in db.Lists
            let dot = list.LabelNumber.IndexOf('.')
            let name = list.LabelNumber
            let order = dot == -1
                ? new { a = Convert.ToInt32(name.Substring(0, dot)), b = String.Empty }
                : new { a = Convert.ToInt32(name.Substring(0, dot)), b = name.Substring(dot+1) }
            orderby order.a, order.b
            select list.LabelNumber;


If you are sure that q is well-formatted and sequenced:

var result = q.OrderBy(x => int.Parse(x.Split('.')[0]));


Here is my contribution.. using Regular Expression and LAMBDA expression

List<String> Lst = new List<string> { "1", "2", "2.A","10.A", "2.C", "3", "3.A", "3.B","2.B","11.D" };
Lst = Lst.Select(X => new
        {
            Number = int.Parse( Regex.Match(X, @"([0-9]*).?([a-zA-Z]*)").Groups[1].Value),
            Strings=Regex.Match(X, @"([0-9]*).?([a-zA-Z]*)").Groups[2].Value,
            OriginalString = X
        }).OrderBy(X => X.Number).ThenBy(X=>X.Strings)
        .Select(X => X.OriginalString).ToList();

Output:

"1"
"2"
"2.A"
"2.B"
"2.C"
"3"
"3.A"
"3.B"
"10.A"
"11.D"
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号