How do I check that a number is float or integer?_问答_开发者

How to find that a number is float or integer?

1.25 --> float  
1 --> integer  
0 --> integer  
0.25 --> floa开发者_开发问答t

check for a remainder when dividing by 1:

function isInt(n) {
   return n % 1 === 0;
}

If you don't know that the argument is a number you need two tests:

function isInt(n){
    return Number(n) === n && n % 1 === 0;
}

function isFloat(n){
    return Number(n) === n && n % 1 !== 0;
}

Update 2019 5 years after this answer was written, a solution was standardized in ECMA Script 2015. That solution is covered in this answer.

Try these functions to test whether a value is a number primitive value that has no fractional part and is within the size limits of what can be represented as an exact integer.

function isFloat(n) {
    return n === +n && n !== (n|0);
}

function isInteger(n) {
    return n === +n && n === (n|0);
}

There is a method called Number.isInteger() which is currently implemented in everything but IE. MDN also provides a polyfill for other browsers:

Number.isInteger = Number.isInteger || function(value) {
  return typeof value === 'number' && 
    isFinite(value) && 
    Math.floor(value) === value;
};

However, for most uses cases, you are better off using Number.isSafeInteger which also checks if the value is so high/low that any decimal places would have been lost anyway. MDN has a polyfil for this as well. (You also need the isInteger pollyfill above.)

if (!Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER) {
    Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER = 9007199254740991; // Math.pow(2, 53) - 1;
}
Number.isSafeInteger = Number.isSafeInteger || function (value) {
   return Number.isInteger(value) && Math.abs(value) <= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER;
};

Why not something like this:

var isInt = function(n) { return parseInt(n) === n };

You can use a simple regular expression:

function isInt(value) {

    var er = /^-?[0-9]+$/;

    return er.test(value);
}

Or you can use the below functions too, according your needs. They are developed by the PHPJS Project.

is_int() => Check if variable type is integer and if its content is integer

is_float() => Check if variable type is float and if its content is float

ctype_digit() => Check if variable type is string and if its content has only decimal digits

Update 1

Now it checks negative numbers too, thanks for @ChrisBartley comment!

function isInteger(x) { return typeof x === "number" && isFinite(x) && Math.floor(x) === x; }
function isFloat(x) { return !!(x % 1); }

// give it a spin

isInteger(1.0);        // true
isFloat(1.0);          // false
isFloat(1.2);          // true
isInteger(1.2);        // false
isFloat(1);            // false
isInteger(1);          // true    
isFloat(2e+2);         // false
isInteger(2e+2);       // true
isFloat('1');          // false
isInteger('1');        // false
isFloat(NaN);          // false
isInteger(NaN);        // false
isFloat(null);         // false
isInteger(null);       // false
isFloat(undefined);    // false
isInteger(undefined);  // false

Here are efficient functions that check if the value is a number or can be safely converted to a number:

function isNumber(value) {
    if ((undefined === value) || (null === value)) {
        return false;
    }
    if (typeof value == 'number') {
        return true;
    }
    return !isNaN(value - 0);
}

And for integers (would return false if the value is a float):

function isInteger(value) {
    if ((undefined === value) || (null === value)) {
        return false;
    }
    return value % 1 == 0;
}

The efficiency here is that parseInt (or parseNumber) are avoided when the value already is a number. Both parsing functions always convert to string first and then attempt to parse that string, which would be a waste if the value already is a number.

Thank you to the other posts here for providing further ideas for optimization!

function isInt(n) 
{
    return n != "" && !isNaN(n) && Math.round(n) == n;
}
function isFloat(n){
    return n != "" && !isNaN(n) && Math.round(n) != n;
}

works for all cases.

How about this one?

isFloat(num) {
    return typeof num === "number" && !Number.isInteger(num);
}

2022 update - We could simply use the Number's methods.

Check if integer or float : Number.isFinite(val)

Check if integer : Number.isInteger(val)

Check if float (not integer) : !Number.isInteger(val) && Number.isFinite(val)

As others mentioned, you only have doubles in JS. So how do you define a number being an integer? Just check if the rounded number is equal to itself:

function isInteger(f) {
    return typeof(f)==="number" && Math.round(f) == f;
}
function isFloat(f) { return typeof(f)==="number" && !isInteger(f); }

We can check by isInteger function. ie number will return true and float return false

console.log(Number.isInteger(2)),<BR>

Will return true

console.log(Number.isInteger(2.5))
Will return false

Any Float number with a zero decimal part (e.g. 1.0, 12.00, 0.0) are implicitly cast to Integer, so it is not possible to check if they are Float or not.

Here's what I use for integers:

Math.ceil(parseFloat(val)) === val

Short, nice :) Works all the time. This is what David Flanagan suggests if I'm not mistaken.

!!(24%1) // false
!!(24.2%1) // true

var isInt = function (n) { return n === (n | 0); };

Haven't had a case where this didn't do the job.

Simple integer test:

if( n === parseInt(n) ) ...

Makes sense: if JavaScript can convert something to an integer, and by the conversion it becomes the exact same thing, then your operand was an integer.

Test cases for console:

x = 1;     x===parseInt(x); // true
x = "1";   x===parseInt(x); // false
x = 1.1;   x===parseInt(x); // false, obviously

// BUT!

x = 1.0;   x===parseInt(x); // true, because 1.0 is NOT a float!

This confuses a lot of people. Whenever something is .0, it's not a float anymore. It's an integer. Or you can just call it "a numeric thing" for there is no strict distinction like back then in C. Good old times.

So basically, all you can do is check for integer accepting the fact that 1.000 is an integer.

Interesting side note

There was a comment about huge numbers. Huge numbers mean NO problem for this approach; whenever parseInt is unable to handle the number (for it's too big) it will return something else than the actual value so the test will return FALSE. Look:

var a = 99999999999999999999;
var b = 999999999999999999999; // just one more 9 will kill the show!

var aIsInteger = (  a===parseInt(a)  )?"a is ok":"a fails";
var bIsInteger = (  b===parseInt(b)  )?"b is ok":"b fails";

alert(aIsInteger+"; "+bIsInteger);

I tested this in 2014 on IE8, then 2021 on Chrome, both returns "a is ok; b fails" which means if a number is too big, it can't be an integer anymore.

20 digits ought to be enough for anybody, to quote a classic.

It really depends on what you want to achieve. If you want to "emulate" strongly typed languages then I suggest you not trying. As others mentioned all numbers have the same representation (the same type).

Using something like Claudiu provided:

isInteger( 1.0 ) -> true

which looks fine for common sense, but in something like C you would get false

Trying some of the answers here I ended up writing this solution. This works also with numbers inside a string.

function isInt(number) {
    if(!/^["|']{0,1}[-]{0,1}\d{0,}(\.{0,1}\d+)["|']{0,1}$/.test(number)) return false;
    return !(number - parseInt(number));
}

function isFloat(number) {
    if(!/^["|']{0,1}[-]{0,1}\d{0,}(\.{0,1}\d+)["|']{0,1}$/.test(number)) return false;
    return number - parseInt(number) ? true : false;
}

    var tests = {
        'integer' : 1,
        'float' : 1.1,
        'integerInString' : '5',
        'floatInString' : '5.5',
        'negativeInt' : -345,
        'negativeFloat' : -34.98,
        'negativeIntString' : '-45',
        'negativeFloatString' : '-23.09',
        'notValidFalse' : false,
        'notValidTrue' : true,
        'notValidString' : '45lorem',
        'notValidStringFloat' : '4.5lorem',
        'notValidNan' : NaN,
        'notValidObj' : {},
        'notValidArr' : [1,2],
    };

    function isInt(number) {
        if(!/^["|']{0,1}[-]{0,1}\d{0,}(\.{0,1}\d+)["|']{0,1}$/.test(number)) return false;
        return !(number - parseInt(number));
    }
    
    function isFloat(number) {
        if(!/^["|']{0,1}[-]{0,1}\d{0,}(\.{0,1}\d+)["|']{0,1}$/.test(number)) return false;
        return number - parseInt(number) ? true : false;
    }

    function testFunctions(obj) {
        var keys = Object.keys(obj);
        var values = Object.values(obj);

        values.forEach(function(element, index){
            console.log(`Is ${keys[index]} (${element}) var an integer? ${isInt(element)}`);
            console.log(`Is ${keys[index]} (${element}) var a float? ${isFloat(element)}`);
        });
    }

    testFunctions(tests);

function isInteger(n) {
   return ((typeof n==='number')&&(n%1===0));
}

function isFloat(n) {
   return ((typeof n==='number')&&(n%1!==0));
}

function isNumber(n) {
   return (typeof n==='number');
}

It really doesn't have to be so complicated. The numeric value of an integer's parseFloat() and parseInt() equivalents will be the same. Thus you can do like so:

function isInt(value){ 
    return (parseFloat(value) == parseInt(value)) && !isNaN(value);
}

Then

if (isInt(x)) // do work

This will also allow for string checks and thus is not strict. If want a strong type solution (aka, wont work with strings):

function is_int(value){ return !isNaN(parseInt(value * 1) }

THIS IS FINAL CODE FOR CHECK BOTH INT AND FLOAT

function isInt(n) { 
   if(typeof n == 'number' && Math.Round(n) % 1 == 0) {
       return true;
   } else {
       return false;
   }
}

function isInt(n) {   
   return typeof n == 'number' && Math.Round(n) % 1 == 0;   
}

This solution worked for me.

<html>
<body>
  <form method="post" action="#">
    <input type="text" id="number_id"/>
    <input type="submit" value="send"/>
  </form>
  <p id="message"></p>
  <script>
    var flt=document.getElementById("number_id").value;
    if(isNaN(flt)==false && Number.isInteger(flt)==false)
    {
     document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="the number_id is a float ";
    }
   else 
   {
     document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="the number_id is a Integer";
   }
  </script>
</body>
</html>

try this

let n;
return (n = value % 1) !== 0 && !isNaN(n);

when the return value is false means the input value is float number or float string, otherwise the input value is integer numbef or integer string.

basically it needs to check the precision value for not equal to zero.

another one is to check the correct string number also.

const integerCheck = (num) => {
        const isInt = (n) => Number(n) === n && n % 1 === 0
        const isFloat = (n) => Number(n) === n && n % 1 !== 0
        return (isInt(num) || !isFloat(num))        
}
console.log( integerCheck('23.3') );

For integers I use this

function integer_or_null(value) {
    if ((undefined === value) || (null === value)) {
        return null;
    }
    if(value % 1 != 0) {
        return null;
    }
    return value;
}

In java script all the numbers are internally 64 bit floating point, same as double in java. There are no diffrent types in javascript, all are represented by type number. Hence you wil l not be able make a instanceof check. However u can use the above solutions given to find out if it is a fractional number. designers of java script felt with a single type they can avoid numerous type cast errors.

For those curious, using Benchmark.js I tested the most up-voted answers (and the one posted today) on this post, here are my results:

var n = -10.4375892034758293405790;
var suite = new Benchmark.Suite;
suite
    // kennebec
    .add('0', function() {
        return n % 1 == 0;
    })
    // kennebec
    .add('1', function() {
        return typeof n === 'number' && n % 1 == 0;
    })
    // kennebec
    .add('2', function() {
        return typeof n === 'number' && parseFloat(n) == parseInt(n, 10) && !isNaN(n);
    })

    // Axle
    .add('3', function() {
        return n.toString().indexOf('.') === -1;
    })

    // Dagg Nabbit
    .add('4', function() {
        return n === +n && n === (n|0);
    })

    // warfares
    .add('5', function() {
        return parseInt(n) === n;
    })

    // Marcio Simao
    .add('6', function() {
        return /^-?[0-9]+$/.test(n.toString());
    })

    // Tal Liron
    .add('7', function() {
        if ((undefined === n) || (null === n)) {
            return false;
        }
        if (typeof n == 'number') {
            return true;
        }
        return !isNaN(n - 0);
    });

// Define logs and Run
suite.on('cycle', function(event) {
    console.log(String(event.target));
}).on('complete', function() {
    console.log('Fastest is ' + this.filter('fastest').pluck('name'));
}).run({ 'async': true });

0 x 12,832,357 ops/sec ±0.65% (90 runs sampled)
1 x 12,916,439 ops/sec ±0.62% (95 runs sampled)
2 x 2,776,583 ops/sec ±0.93% (92 runs sampled)
3 x 10,345,379 ops/sec ±0.49% (97 runs sampled)
4 x 53,766,106 ops/sec ±0.66% (93 runs sampled)
5 x 26,514,109 ops/sec ±2.72% (93 runs sampled)
6 x 10,146,270 ops/sec ±2.54% (90 runs sampled)
7 x 60,353,419 ops/sec ±0.35% (97 runs sampled)

Fastest is 7 Tal Liron

I like this little function, which will return true for both positive and negative integers:

function isInt(val) {
    return ["string","number"].indexOf(typeof(val)) > -1 && val !== '' && !isNaN(val+".0");
}

This works because 1 or "1" becomes "1.0", which isNaN() returns false on (which we then negate and return), but 1.0 or "1.0" becomes "1.0.0", while "string" becomes "string.0", neither of which are numbers, so isNaN() returns false (and, again, gets negated).

If you only want positive integers, there's this variant:

function isPositiveInt(val) {
    return ["string","number"].indexOf(typeof(val)) > -1 && val !== '' && !isNaN("0"+val);
}

or, for negative integers:

function isNegativeInt(val) {
    return `["string","number"].indexOf(typeof(val)) > -1` && val !== '' && isNaN("0"+val);
}

isPositiveInt() works by moving the concatenated numeric string ahead of the value to be tested. For example, isPositiveInt(1) results in isNaN() evaluating "01", which evaluates false. Meanwhile, isPositiveInt(-1) results in isNaN() evaluating "0-1", which evaluates true. We negate the return value and that gives us what we want. isNegativeInt() works similarly, but without negating the return value of isNaN().

Edit:

My original implementation would also return true on arrays and empty strings. This implementation doe not have that defect. It also has the benefit of returning early if val is not a string or number, or if it's an empty string, making it faster in these cases. You can further modify it by replacing the first two clauses with

typeof(val) != "number"

if you only want to match literal numbers (and not strings)

Edit:

I can't post comments yet, so I'm adding this to my answer. The benchmark posted by @Asok is very informative; however, the fastest function does not fit the requirements, as it also returns TRUE for floats, arrays, booleans, and empty strings.

I created the following test suite to test each of the functions, adding my answer to the list, as well (function 8, which parses strings, and function 9, which does not):

funcs = [
    function(n) {
        return n % 1 == 0;
    },
    function(n) {
        return typeof n === 'number' && n % 1 == 0;
    },
    function(n) {
        return typeof n === 'number' && parseFloat(n) == parseInt(n, 10) && !isNaN(n);
    },
    function(n) {
        return n.toString().indexOf('.') === -1;
    },
    function(n) {
        return n === +n && n === (n|0);
    },
    function(n) {
        return parseInt(n) === n;
    },
    function(n) {
        return /^-?[0-9]+$/.test(n.toString());
    },
    function(n) {
        if ((undefined === n) || (null === n)) {
            return false;
        }
        if (typeof n == 'number') {
            return true;
        }
        return !isNaN(n - 0);
    },
    function(n) {
        return ["string","number"].indexOf(typeof(n)) > -1 && n !== '' && !isNaN(n+".0");
    }
];
vals = [
    [1,true],
    [-1,true],
    [1.1,false],
    [-1.1,false],
    [[],false],
    [{},false],
    [true,false],
    [false,false],
    [null,false],
    ["",false],
    ["a",false],
    ["1",null],
    ["-1",null],
    ["1.1",null],
    ["-1.1",null]
];

for (var i in funcs) {
    var pass = true;
    console.log("Testing function "+i);
    for (var ii in vals) {
        var n = vals[ii][0];
        var ns;
        if (n === null) {
            ns = n+"";
        } else {
            switch (typeof(n)) {
                case "string":
                    ns = "'" + n + "'";
                    break;
                case "object":
                    ns = Object.prototype.toString.call(n);
                    break;
                default:
                    ns = n;
            }
            ns = "("+typeof(n)+") "+ns;
        }

        var x = vals[ii][1];
        var xs;
        if (x === null) {
            xs = "(ANY)";
        } else {
            switch (typeof(x)) {
                case "string":
                    xs = "'" + n + "'";
                    break;
                case "object":
                    xs = Object.prototype.toString.call(x);
                    break;
                default:
                    xs = x;
            }
            xs = "("+typeof(x)+") "+xs;
        }

        var rms;
        try {
            var r = funcs[i](n);
            var rs;
            if (r === null) {
                rs = r+"";
            } else {
                switch (typeof(r)) {
                    case "string":
                        rs = "'" + r + "'";
                        break;
                    case "object":
                        rs = Object.prototype.toString.call(r);
                        break;
                    default:
                        rs = r;
                }
                rs = "("+typeof(r)+") "+rs;
            }

            var m;
            var ms;
            if (x === null) {
                m = true;
                ms = "N/A";
            } else if (typeof(x) == 'object') {
                m = (xs === rs);
                ms = m;
            } else {
                m = (x === r);
                ms = m;
            }
            if (!m) {
                pass = false;
            }
            rms = "Result: "+rs+", Match: "+ms;
        } catch (e) {
            rms = "Test skipped; function threw exception!"
        }

        console.log("    Value: "+ns+", Expect: "+xs+", "+rms);
    }
    console.log(pass ? "PASS!" : "FAIL!");
}

I also reran the benchmark with function #8 added to the list. I won't post the result, as they're a bit embarrassing (e.g. that function is NOT fast)...

The (abridged -- I removed successful tests, since the output is quite long) results are as follows:

Testing function 0
Value: (object) [object Array], Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (boolean) true, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (boolean) false, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: null, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (string) '', Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
FAIL!

Testing function 1
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
PASS!

Testing function 2
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
PASS!

Testing function 3
Value: (object) true, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (object) false, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (boolean) [object Array], Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (boolean) [object Object], Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: null, Expect: (boolean) false, Test skipped; function threw exception!
Value: (string) '', Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (string) 'a', Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
FAIL!

Testing function 4
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
PASS!

Testing function 5
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
PASS!

Testing function 6
Value: null, Expect: (boolean) false, Test skipped; function threw exception!
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
PASS!

Testing function 7
Value: (number) 1.1, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (number) -1.1, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (object) true, Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (boolean) [object Array], Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (boolean) [object Object], Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (string) '', Expect: (boolean) false, Result: (boolean) true, Match: false
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
FAIL!

Testing function 8
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) true, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
PASS!

Testing function 9
Value: (string) '1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
Value: (string) '-1.1', Expect: (ANY), Result: (boolean) false, Match: N/A
PASS!

I've left in failures so you can see where each function is failing, and the (string) '#' tests so you can see how each function handles integer and float values in strings, as some may want these parsed as numbers and some may not.

Out of the 10 functions tested, the ones that actually fit OP's requirements are [1,3,5,6,8,9]

function int(a) {
  return a - a === 0 && a.toString(32).indexOf('.') === -1
}

function float(a) {
  return a - a === 0 && a.toString(32).indexOf('.') !== -1
}

You can add typeof a === 'number' if you want to exclude strings.