I have defined a prolog file with the following code:
divisible(X, Y) :-
X mod Y =:= 0.
divisibleBy(X, Y) :-
divisible(X, Y).
op(35,xfx,divisibleBy).
Prolog is complaining that
'$record_clause'/2: No permission to modify static_procedure `op/3'
What am I doing wrong? I want to define an divisibleBy operator that will allow me to write code like the following:
开发者_如何学Python4 divisibleBy 2
Thanks.
Use
:- op(35,xfx,divisibleBy).
:-
tells the Prolog interpreter to evaluate the next term while loading the file, i.e. make a predicate call, instead of treating it as a definition (in this case a redefinition of op/3
).
The answer given by @larsmans is spot-on regarding your original problem.
However, you should reconsider if you should define a new operator.
In general, I would strongly advise against defining new operators for the following reasons:
- The gain in readability is often overrated.
- It may easily introduce new problems in places you wouldn't normally expect buggy.
- It doesn't "scale" well: a small number of operators can make code on presentation slides super-concise, but what if you add more discriminate union cases over time? More operators?
精彩评论