In GTK+ calls, arguments should (but don't have to) be casted from GtkWidget
to the most specific class needed by the function before passing the argument. For example, sometimes I see
some_call(GTK_WINDOW(window));
while other times, I see
some_call((GtkWindow *) window);
What's the diffe开发者_高级运维rence?
GTK_WINDOW
is a macro that does the cast.
As seen here
#define GTK_WINDOW(obj) (GTK_CHECK_CAST ((obj), GTK_TYPE_WINDOW, GtkWindow))
Again
#define GTK_CHECK_CAST G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST
and
#define G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST(instance, g_type, c_type) (_G_TYPE_CIC ((instance), (g_type), c_type))
which is...
#define _G_TYPE_CIC(ip,gt,ct) \
((ct*) g_type_check_instance_cast ((GTypeInstance*) ip, gt))
The code for g_type_check_instance_cast
can be found here
GTypeInstance*
g_type_check_instance_cast (GTypeInstance *type_instance,
GType iface_type)
{
if (type_instance)
{
if (type_instance->g_class)
{
TypeNode *node, *iface;
gboolean is_instantiatable, check;
node = lookup_type_node_I (type_instance->g_class->g_type);
is_instantiatable = node && node->is_instantiatable;
iface = lookup_type_node_I (iface_type);
check = is_instantiatable && iface && type_node_conforms_to_U (node, iface, TRUE, FALSE);
if (check)
return type_instance;
if (is_instantiatable)
g_warning ("invalid cast from `%s' to `%s'",
type_descriptive_name_I (type_instance->g_class->g_type),
type_descriptive_name_I (iface_type));
else
g_warning ("invalid uninstantiatable type `%s' in cast to `%s'",
type_descriptive_name_I (type_instance->g_class->g_type),
type_descriptive_name_I (iface_type));
}
else
g_warning ("invalid unclassed pointer in cast to `%s'",
type_descriptive_name_I (iface_type));
}
return type_instance;
}
The first one is a macro that can both test whether the cast is possible and performs the cast. It's GTKs version/attempt of a type-safe cast. You should use that one.
GTK_WINDOW() is simply a macro that would look something like this:
#define GTK_WINDOW(a) ((GtkWindow*)a)
This is identical to doing an explicit cast by yourself, and the two statements you should in your post are identical.
精彩评论