开发者

Currying out of order in Haskell

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-17 06:26 出处:网络
Is there an elegant notation for Currying the arguments of a function out of order in Haskell? For example, if you wish to divide 2 by all elements of 开发者_StackOverflow中文版a list, you can write

Is there an elegant notation for Currying the arguments of a function out of order in Haskell?

For example, if you wish to divide 2 by all elements of 开发者_StackOverflow中文版a list, you can write

map ((/) 2) [1,2,3,4,5]

However to divide all elements of a list it seems you need to define an anonymous function

map (\x -> x/2) [1,2,3,4,5]

Anonymous functions quickly become unwieldy in more complex cases. I'm aware that in this case map ((*) 0.5) [1,2,3,4,5] would work fine, but I'm interested to know if Haskell has a more elegant way of currying arguments of a function out of order?


In this particular case:

Prelude> map (/2) [1..5]
[0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5]

Not only you can use an infix operator as ordinary prefix function, you can also partially apply it in infix form. Likewise, the first example would better be written as map (2/) [1..5]

Also, there's flip which is not quite as elegant, but still the best option available for ordinary functions (when you don't want to turn them into infix via backticks):

Prelude> let div' = (/)
Prelude> div' 2 1
2.0
Prelude> flip div' 2 1
0.5


For your second one, the lambda is unnecessary, just use like:

map (/2) [1..5]

The form (/2) simply means, that you want to access the second param of an operator. It is also possible with the first argument (2/). This is called a section, and is a really useful hack, not only in code golf. You can also use it in prefix functions, if you use them infix:

map (`div` 2) [1..5]

In more difficult cases, like 3 or more arguments, you're supposed to use lambdas, as it becomes more readable most times.


I think you are looking for a generalized solution, like the cut in scheme. Right?

There is the flip function that reverse the first 2 arguments of a function. There may be other functions doing a similar task (I'm not too good at Haskell... yet).


I encountered a very similar issue myself recently, and I wasn't able to find an elegant solution other than using a helper function to do it:

dbfunc f b c = (\a -> liftIO $ f a b c)
deleteAllRows = do
  ask >>= dbfunc run "delete from t1" []

At least this pattern is common enough in HDBC that dbfunc is reusable.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消