开发者

Spring @Transactional concurrency

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-16 06:14 出处:网络
class MyService { public void a() { synchronized(somekey) { b(); } } @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)


class MyService {

public void a() { synchronized(somekey) { b(); } }

@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW) public void b() { ...do DB works... } }

My aim is

    1 - get the key
    2 - start transaction
    3 - commit tra开发者_运维问答nsaction
    4 - release the key

When i call a() method from outside, transaction doesn't work.

Any suggestions ?

Thanks.


Unless you're using code weaving, this can't work.

The default way Spring handles transactions is through AOP proxies. The call to a transactional method goes like this:

 caller --> ProxyClass.a() --> YourClass.a()

If you call another method on the same object, you're not going through the proxy, so there is no transactional behaviour.

 caller --> ProxyClass.a() --> YourClass.a() --> YourClass.b()

If you don't want to use AspectJ, you can get the proxy object using AopContext.currentProxy().


Not 100% sure. I think all @Transactional calls must be done on the same thread that a transaction started on. I know for certain that @Transactional doesn't work across threads. (I guess by design)


I'm curious as to the nature of the key. Why is the service generating it? Wouldn't an alternative design put that in the database?

It's hard to tell exactly what's wrong without an error message.


If you want to call b() inside of a(), and you want to make b() transactional, you have to put it into separate class.


Method call to b() is internal call not on transactional proxy as said by Henning.

Whole thing is explained in this blog post.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消