Am working on a .Net windows application which internally uses a COM dll. Out of the following 4 ways of releasing a COM obje开发者_开发技巧ct, which is the best one?
1.
if (obj != null)
{
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(obj);
}
2.
if (obj != null)
{
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(obj);
obj=null;
}
3.if (obj != null)
{
Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(obj);
}
4.if (obj != null)
{
Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(obj);
obj=null;
}
Thanks for reading.
Either just let the GC deal with it as Richard suggested, or your number 2. If you call FinalReleaseComObject
, you will destroy the runtime callable wrapper, regardless if it's found its way to other parts of your code as well. This could seriously confuse other parts of your code. So you should only call ReleaseComObject
once per crossing-into-.NET-land-from-COM transition.
5. Let the GC do it.
Which is fine unless the COM component is holding on to significant resources you need.
If you are basing your approach on checking obj != null
then setting obj
to null
is a good idea, unless you are sure this code will not be called multiple times.
The best way: need more details about the implementation of your application to give specific advise between use of ReleaseComObject
and FinalReleaseComObject
, but ideally the answer would be neither.
精彩评论