开发者

Scala: Using HashMap with a default value

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-15 03:07 出处:网络
I have a mutable HashMap and would like to use it like a default-dictionary. The obvious method appears to be to use getOrElse and provide the default value each time as 开发者_运维问答a second value.

I have a mutable HashMap and would like to use it like a default-dictionary. The obvious method appears to be to use getOrElse and provide the default value each time as 开发者_运维问答a second value. However this seems a little inelegant in my use case since the default value doesn't change.

var x = HashMap(1 -> "b", 2 -> "a", 3 -> "c")

println(x.getOrElse(4, "_")
println(x.getOrElse(5, "_"))
// And so on...
println(x.getOrElse(10, "_"))

Is there any way to create a HashMap (or similar class) such that attempting to access undefined keys returns a default value set on the creation of the HashMap? I notice that HashMap.default is just set to throw an exception but I wonder if this can be changed...


Wow, I happened to visit this thread exactly one year after I posted my last answer here. :-)

Scala 2.9.1. mutable.Map comes with a withDefaultValue method. REPL session:

scala> import collection.mutable
import collection.mutable

scala> mutable.Map[Int, String]().withDefaultValue("")
res18: scala.collection.mutable.Map[Int,String] = Map()

scala> res18(3)
res19: String = ""


Try this:

import collection.mutable.HashMap
val x = new HashMap[Int,String]()  { override def default(key:Int) = "-" }
x += (1 -> "b", 2 -> "a", 3 -> "c")

Then:

scala> x(1)
res7: String = b

scala> x(2)
res8: String = a

scala> x(3)
res9: String = c

scala> x(4)
res10: String = -


scala> val x = HashMap(1 -> "b", 2 -> "a", 3 -> "c").withDefaultValue("-")
x: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,java.lang.String] = Map((1,b), (2,a), (3,c))

scala> x(3)
res0: java.lang.String = c

scala> x(5)
res1: java.lang.String = -

EDIT:

For mutable.HashMap, you could do the following:

scala> import collection.mutable
import collection.mutable

scala> val x = new mutable.HashMap[Int, String] {
     |   override def apply(key: Int) = super.get(key) getOrElse "-"
     | }
x: scala.collection.mutable.HashMap[Int,String] = Map()

scala> x += (1 -> "a", 2 -> "b", 3 -> "c")
res9: x.type = Map((2,b), (1,a), (3,c))

scala> x(2)
res10: String = b

scala> x(4)
res11: String = -

There might be a better way to do this. Wait for others to respond.


I'm more a java guy... but if getOrElse is not final, why don't you just extend HasMap and provide something like this:

override def getOrElse(k: Int, default: String) = {
  return super.getOrElse(k,"_")
}

Note: syntax is probably screwed up but hopefully you'll get the point

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消