Currently, JAXB is creating a point class from the xml schema I have specified. However, I would prefer it to use the existing java.awt.Point class. And for any o开发者_开发问答ther types I have defined to use and import java.awt.Point too.
Here is my point code:
<xs:complexType name="point">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="x" type="xs:int" />
<xs:element name="y" type="xs:int" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
Is this possible?
I don't know if my solution is very elegant but I believe it works as you demand.
Consider class Test
with a property p
of type java.awt.Point
:
@XmlRootElement
public class Test {
@XmlElement
@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(PointAdapter.class)
public Point p;
}
The class PointAdapter
is as follows:
class PointAdapter extends XmlAdapter<String, Point> {
@Override
public String marshal(Point v) throws Exception {
return String.format("%d;%d", v.x, v.y);
}
@Override
public Point unmarshal(String v) throws Exception {
String[] coords = v.split(";");
return new Point(Integer.parseInt(coords[0]), Integer.parseInt(coords[1]));
}
}
If you don't create your Java classes by hand but let them generate by xjc
there is a possibility to specify the XmlAdapter
in the schema too; either through a seperate binding file that you can specify with the -b
option of xjc
or embedded in your XSD. Personally I prefer the first solution as this keeps the schema clean. Since it has been a while since I played with this I refer you to the JAXB documentation (look for MyDatatypeConverter; this should be the most relevant part).
精彩评论