Help me understand Resharper background compilation_问答_开发者

So Jeff Atwood rightly complained about Visual Studio not performing background compilation see: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/05/c-and-the-compilation-tax.html

The solution from most sources seems to be Reshaper which will incrementally perform background compilation as you write. This leads to their great realtime re-factoring tips and error detection.

But what I don't understand is with R# continually compiling my code, why does it take so long when executing a compilation via VS (i.e. Ctrl + Shift + B or simil开发者_如何学运维ar). What I mean by this is, if R# has already compiled my code then why would I need a recompilation?

My assumption is of course that R# is not overriding the assemblies in my bin directories but instead holding the compilation results in memory. In which case, is it possible to tell R# to simply override my assemblies when compilation is successful?

I don't know about "rightly complained" - that's an opinion I happen to disagree with:)

However, the VB.NET (and probably Resharper c#) background compilers do not actually compile full assemblies - they cannot! If you think about it, the natural state of your code while you are working is not compilable! Almost every keystroke puts your code in an invalid state. Think of this line:

var x = new Something();

As you type this, from the key "v" to the key ")", your code is "wrong". Or what if you are referencing a method you haven't defined yet? And if this code is in an assembly that another assembly requires, how would you compile that second assembly at all, background or not?

The background compilers get around this by compiling small chunks of your code into multiple transient "assemblies" that are actually just metadata holders - really, they don't care about the actual effects of the code as much as the symbols defined, used, etc. When you finally hit build, the actual full assemblies still need to be built.

So no, I don't believe it's possible because they're not built to do actual full compilation - they are built to check your code and interpret symbols on the fly.

Reshaper which will incrementally perform background compilation as you write

It doesn't, it just parses the source code. The exact same thing Visual Studio already does if you don't have Resharper, that's how it implements IntelliSense, its own refactoring features and commands like GoTo Definition and Find All References. Visual Studio also parses in the background, updating its data while you type. Resharper just implements more bells and whistles with that parsing data.

Going from parsing the code to actually generating the assembly is a pretty major step. The internal format of an assembly is too convoluted to allow this to happen in the background without affecting the responsiveness of the machine.

And the C# compiler is still a large chunk of unmanaged C++ code that is independent from the IDE. An inevitable consequence of having to have the compiler first. It is however a stated goal for the next version of C# to provide compile-on-demand services. Getting true background compilation is a possibility.

I don't really have an answer but I just wanted to say that I have been using Eclipse and Java for 4 months now and I love the automatic compilation. I have a very large java code base and compilation happens constantly as I save code changes. When I hit Run everything is ready to go! It's just awesome. It also deploys to the local web server instance (Tomcat in my case) automatically as I make code changes. All this is setup by default in Eclipse.

I hope Microsoft does something similar with .net in the near future.