Managing multiple-processes: What are the common strategies?_问答_开发者

While multithreading is faster in some cases, sometimes we j开发者_如何学Pythonust want to spawn multiple worker processes to do work. This has the benefits of not crashing the main app if one of the worker crashes, and that the user doesn't need to worry a lot about inter-locking stuffs.

COM+'s Application Pooling seems like a good way to achieve this on Windows. The downside is that we need to write a COM+ wrapper for the worker process.

However, when I search for Application Pooling on Google, it seems like most of its usages are related to IIS. Don't other applications (such as scientific/graphics) find it useful to spawn multiple worker processes?

So there are several questions:

Why isn't COM+ more popular in areas other than IIS? If I write a non-IIS application and want to use process management on Windows, should I go with COM+ or are there better alternatives out there?
What would be the cross platform way to do it? Are there libraries out there that give me a "process pool" (worker processes will intelligently pick up work, can be managed, etc.)

I can't offer any answers to the COM aspect of your question, but it's worth noting there's another world (besides HPC MPI) where multi-processing (rather than the more common multi-threading approach) is apparently alive, well and thriving: Python.

Why ? Python's GIL ("global interpreter lock") cripples most attempts to multithread python code so badly that multiprocessing is the generally recommended approach to parallelising Python on SMP. The standard library includes process pools; there are various other options too.

Python certainly ought to satisfy any multi-platform requirement!

You might want to investigate how the apache web server manages process pools. From version 2.0 it runs natively on windows and one of the multi-processing models it supports are process pools. A part of apache is also APR (apache portable runtime), which handles platform-specific issues.

No one can answer why something is not popular because may be no body is looking for what you are looking for. After .NET came in picture, people shifted from COM to Managed Environment, before .NET, COM and ATL and relative other technologies were quite painful to implement and they would crash and were also quite difficult to debug.

That is the reason, managed environment came in existence.

However, .NET 4 onwards, parallel libraries give much more power to user for parallel programming and also you can spawn and control other proceeses.

For multiplatform, you can look for zvrba's answer.

Yes, other applications--especially science applications--find it useful to spawn multiple processes. Since few super-computers run Microsoft Windows, scientists generally avoid using anything that ties them to a Microsoft platform. Nothing related to COM will help scientists leverage their enormous existing code base written in Fortran.

People who choose to run IIS have generally already drunk the Microsoft Koolaid, so they have fewer inhibitions to tying themselves to Microsoft's proprietary platforms, which is why COM-specific terminology will get lots of hits related to IIS.

One of the open standards for doing what you want is the Message Passing Interface. Several implementations exist and some of them run on supercomputers using Fortran. Some of them run on cheaper computers using sexier languages.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_Passing_Interface

There hasn't been a mob rushing through the doors of COM application pooling primarily because of two factors:

COM is a pain in the ass to deal with compared to just about anything else
Threading can be a headache, but it's a lot easier and more convenient to manage than inter-process communication

COM application pooling was essentially created for IIS. It has one very specific benefit over normal multithreading: the multiple processes are fully isolated from each other. This is important for data security and for app stability when dealing with third party plugins of questionable stability.

Scientific computing generally doesn't need strong data security isolation between operations, and I would venture to guess that scientific computing doesn't rely much on third party plugins of questionable stability. When doing big math operations, you're either using a sexy numerics library that had better be rock solid to be taken seriously, or you're using your own code, in which case crashes should be fixed and repeat offenders should be spanked.

Oh, and all crashes except stack overflow can be trapped and dealt with within a multithreaded app, especially if it's your own code.

In short, COM app pooling is overkill for just about anything other than IIS.

Google's webbrowser chrome is a multi-process architecture software. It is open source, so you can check out its code and see how to manage processes.