This is just plain weird.
I've got Rails 3 RC running with Devise installed. I've defined a custom strategy to try and use Kerberos for authentication.
module Devise
module Strategies
class Kerb < Devise::Strategies::Base
def valid?
params[:username] || params[:password]
end
def authenticate!
# cheap debugging
puts "PARAMS: #{params}"
if check_kerb_auth(params[:username], params[:password])
# create user account if none exists
u = User.find(:first, :conditions => { :username => params[:username] }) || User.create({ :username => login })
success!(u)
else
fail!("Could not log in")
end
end
def check_kerb_auth(username, password)
require 'krb5_auth'
include Krb5Auth
return false if username.blank? or password.blank?
begin
kerberos = Krb5.new
return kerberos.get_init_creds_password(username, password)
rescue Krb5Auth::Krb5::Exception
return false
end
end
end
end
end
I have the Devise Warden configuration setup as follows:
config.warden do |manager|
manager.strategies.add(:kerb, Devise::Strategies::Kerb)
manager.default_strategies :kerb
end
I get no errors in my log. Everything seems to work ok. If I add "cheap debugging" aka a bunch of puts statements, it seems to reflect that the :kerb strategy is the default. Here is a sample set of logs from a login attempt:
=> Booting WEBrick
=> Rails 3.0.0.rc application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000
=> Call with -d to detach
=> Ctrl-C to shutdown server
[2010-08-17 10:50:35] INFO WEBrick 1.3.1
[2010-08-17 10:50:35] INFO ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10) [x86_64-linux]
[2010-08-17 10:50:40] INFO WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=12717 port=3000
Started POST "/users/login" for 127.0.0.1 at Tue Aug 17 10:50:43 -0400 2010
Processing by Devise::SessionsController#cre开发者_开发问答ate as HTML
Parameters: {"commit"=>"Login", "authenticity_token"=>"afZF6ho96p47dc9LQFwwNN5PqnRpl7x+1J7V3MiKgTE=", "_snowman"=>"\342\230\203", "user"=>{"remember_me"=>"1", "username"=>"hernan43", "password"=>"[FILTERED]"}}
Completed in 0ms
Processing by Devise::SessionsController#new as HTML
Parameters: {"commit"=>"Login", "authenticity_token"=>"afZF6ho96p47dc9LQFwwNN5PqnRpl7x+1J7V3MiKgTE=", "_snowman"=>"\342\230\203", "user"=>{"remember_me"=>"1", "username"=>"hernan43", "password"=>"[FILTERED]"}}
Rendered devise/shared/_links.erb (1.2ms)
Rendered devise/sessions/new.html.erb within layouts/application (8.2ms)
Completed 200 OK in 124ms (Views: 11.7ms | ActiveRecord: 1.3ms)
The kerberos code works in other things on the same machine. I was sort of expecting it to show a bunch of errors if there was a problem but I am getting nothing. Is there a good way to debug Devise/Warden?
In case someone else comes across this, here's what I believe the problem is:
According to Warden Strategies:
valid?
The valid? method acts as a guard for the strategy. It’s optional to declare a valid? method, and if you don’t declare it, the strategy will always be run. If you do declare it though, the strategy will only be tried if #valid? evaluates to true.
The strategy above is reasoning that if there’s either a ‘username’ or a ‘password’ param, then the user is trying to login. If there’s only one of them, then the ‘User.authenticate’ call will fail, but it was still the desired (valid) strategy.
So your valid method:
def valid?
params[:username] || params[:password]
end
It's returning false, so the authenticate!
is never called. params
is a nested hash, so it should be params[:user][:username]
instead of params[:username]
.
Changing your valid method to:
def valid?
params[:user] && (params[:user][:username] || params[:user][:password])
end
will return true and cause the authenticate!
method to be called.
I have run into a similar problem. After a short session of debugging I found out the reason. My user was not confirmed, so after initial successful signing in with my strategy, he was logged out by one of the following modules which is confirmable module :)
Btw, the easiest way to debug rails application is to use following code:
require 'ruby-debug'
Debugger.wait_connection = true
Debugger.start_remote
debugger
and then rdebug -c from terminal.
精彩评论