I need to pass a开发者_如何学C double [][6]
to a method. But I don't know how to create that two-dimensional array.
6
is a fixed size (or a "literal constant", if my terminology is right), which the method accepts. I was trying something like this, but without success...
double *data[6] = new double[6][myVariableSize];
So, the method really looks like:
int myMethod(double obj_data[][6]);
Thanks in advance
I cannot tell from the question which dimension is which, but this might be worth a try:
double (*data)[6] = new double[myVariableSize][6];
In C++ you could use std::array<std::vector<double>, 6>
.
typedef std::array<std::vector<double>, 6> my_array_t;
int myMethod( const my_array_t& obj_data );
If your compiler still doesn't support std::array
you could use boost::array
instead.
This should work:
int myMethod(double obj_data[][6])
...
int myVariableSize = 10;
double (*data)[6] = new double[myVariableSize][6];
myMethod(data);
As mentioned only the first dimension can be variable!
Your method definition should look like this (to match your definition):
int myMethod(double obj_data[6][]);
..but that's not valid C++ because only the first dimension can be undefined. Try the following:
int myMethod(double **obj_data, const int numOfColumns, int numOfRows)
{
// Set the element in the last column / row to 5
obj_data[numOfRows-1][numOfColumns-1] = 5;
return 0;
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
// Define array size
int myNumOfRows = 5;
const int numOfColumns = 6;
// Allocate memory
double** data = new double*[myNumOfRows];
for (int i = 0; i < myNumOfRows; ++i)
{
data[i] = new double[numOfColumns];
}
// Do something with the array
myMethod(data, numOfColumns, myNumOfRows);
return 0;
}
My colleague and I could get no variations of the problem you proposed to work. But this does work and does compile:
int myMethod(double** obj_data)
{
return 5;
}
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
const int myVariableSize = 3;
double** b = new double*[3];
for (int i = 0 ; i < 3;i++)
{
b[i] = new double[myVariableSize];
}
myMethod(data);
return 0;
}
I propose you just go back to using a double vector for a 2D array, or use some of Boost's (so I'm told) multi-dimensional arrays.
精彩评论