I'm working on an experimental programming language that has global polymorphic type inference.
I recently got the algorithm working sufficiently well to correctly type the bits of sample code I'm throwing at it. I'm now looking for something more complex that will exercise the edge cases.
Can anyone point me at a source of really gnarly and horrible code fragments that I can use for this? I'm sure the functional programming world has plenty. I'm particularly looking for examples that do evil things with function recursion开发者_Python百科, as I need to check to make sure that function expansion terminates correctly, but anything's good --- I need to build a test suite. Any suggestions?
My language is largely imperative, but any ML-style code ought to be easy to convert.
My general strategy is actually to approach it from the opposite direction -- ensure that it rejects incorrect things!
That said, here are some standard "confirmation" tests I usually use:
The eager fix point combinator (unashamedly stolen from here):
datatype 'a t = T of 'a t -> 'a
val y = fn f => (fn (T x) => (f (fn a => x (T x) a)))
(T (fn (T x) => (f (fn a => x (T x) a))))
Obvious mutual recursion:
fun f x = g (f x)
and g x = f (g x)
Check out those deeply nested let expressions too:
val a = let
val b = let
val c = let
val d = let
val e = let
val f = let
val g = let
val h = fn x => x + 1
in h end
in g end
in f end
in e end
in d end
in c end
in b end
Deeply nested higher order functions!
fun f g h i j k l m n =
fn x => fn y => fn z => x o g o h o i o j o k o l o m o n o x o y o z
I don't know if you have to have the value restriction in order to incorporate mutable references. If so, see what happens:
fun map' f [] = []
| map' f (h::t) = f h :: map' f t
fun rev' [] = []
| rev' (h::t) = rev' t @ [h]
val x = map' rev'
You might need to implement map
and rev
in the standard way :)
Then with actual references lying around (stolen from here):
val stack =
let val stk = ref [] in
{push = fn x => stk := x :: !stk,
pop = fn () => stk := tl (!stk),
top = fn () => hd (!stk)}
end
Hope these help in some way. Make sure to try to build a set of regression tests you can re-run in some automatic fashion to ensure that all of your type inference behaves correctly through all changes you make :)
精彩评论