Does anyone see the flaw in my code here, because this one has me stumped!
function removeMLRow(rowNo) {
$('#ml_organiz开发者_开发百科e li:eq(' + (rowNo - 1) + ')').remove();
$($('#ml_organize li:eq(' + (rowNo) + ')').get().reverse()).each(function() {
var newID = 'li' + ($(this).index() - 1);
$(this).attr('id',newID);
});
}
I can't say for sure based on the question, but I think this is what you're after:
function removeMLRow(rowNo) {
$('#ml_organize li').eq(rowNo - 1).remove();
$('#ml_organize li').slice(rowNo -1).each(function() {
var newID = 'li' + ($(this).index() + 1);
$(this).attr('id',newID);
});
}
First, you can use .eq()
instead of :eq()
to just make things cleaner. Then we're using .slice()
to get all the <li>
elements after the one we removed and are numbering only those <li>
's. You could use :gt()
(greater-than-index), but .slice()
just trims down on the string concatenation (and is a bit faster, infinitesimal difference though).
Are you sure you should be using reverse. from what i see you're removing an element and then renumbering back to the top. should you be renumbering to the bottom or are the numbers reversed?
more info please @dave
Nick, you were ALMOST there! Needed to (+1) instead of (-1) in the newID.
function removeMLRow(rowNo) {
$('#ml_organize li').eq(rowNo - 1).remove();
$('#ml_organize li').slice(rowNo - 1).each(function() {
var newID = 'li' + ($(this).index() + 1);
$(this).attr('id',newID);
});
var item_positions = $('#ml_organize').sortable('toArray');
alert(item_positions);
}
Thanks to all for your help!
精彩评论