Given an XML layout like this, I'm trying to create a XSD schema to validate it.
<RootNode>
<ChildA />
<ChildC />
<ChildB />
<ChildB />
<ChildA />
</RootNode>
The requirements are as follows:
- ChildA, ChildB and ChildC may occur in any order. (
<xs:sequence>
unsuitable) - ChildA is mandatory but may occur multiple times.
- ChildB is optional and may occur multiple times.
- ChildC is optional and may occur once only.
The technique I usually use to create an unordered list of nodes is to use a <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded">
with each possible node in the list, however, I am unable to create the minOccurs="1"
constraint on ChildA and the maxOccurs="1"
contraint on ChildC. (The # of occurances of the choice takes precedence over those of the elements here).
<xs:element name="RootNode">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element n开发者_如何学JAVAame="ChildA" minOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="ChildB" />
<xs:element name="ChildC" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
Update: In XSD 1.1m some of the constraints on all
-groups have been lifted. See the answers here and here.
Not a simple one but seems doable. Difficult part here is that Schema definitions must be deterministic. Approach I used was to visualize the problem by drawing a finite state automata of it and then to write a regular expression that corresponded that automata. It is not at all as complicated as it might sound. Still, using some other validation system would have likely provided simpler answer.
I have done some testing but missing out some special cases is easy. Please comment if you spot an error.
...and here is the code:
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" >
<!-- Schema for elements ChildA, ChildB and ChildC
The requirements are as follows:
* ChildA, ChildB and ChildC may occur in any order.
* ChildA is mandatory but may occur multiple times.
* ChildB is optional and may occur multiple times.
* ChildC is optional and may occur once only.
-->
<xsd:element name="root">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="ABC-container" type="ABC" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:complexType name="ABC">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="ChildB" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xsd:choice>
<xsd:sequence maxOccurs="1">
<xsd:element name="ChildC" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="ChildB" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xsd:element name="ChildA" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xsd:element name="ChildA" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element name="ChildB" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:sequence maxOccurs="1">
<xsd:element name="ChildA" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="1"/>
<xsd:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xsd:element name="ChildA" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element name="ChildB" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xsd:element name="ChildC" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xsd:element name="ChildA" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element name="ChildB" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:choice>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>
This should do what you specified:
<xs:element name="RootNode">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:all>
<xs:element name="ChildA" minOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="ChildB" />
<xs:element name="ChildC" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:all>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
I was just reading the relax-NG shortcut syntax.
I'm guessing this would be condensed to the following in relax-ng's compact syntax:
head = element root { ChildA & ChildC? & ChildB* }
That sure is pretty.
精彩评论