开发者

Why is viewDidUnload called less often than viewDidLoad?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-08 16:03 出处:网络
I put NSLog(@\"%@::%@\", [[self class] description], NSStringFromSelector(_cmd)); in both viewDidLoad and viewDidUnload of a view controller.

I put NSLog(@"%@::%@", [[self class] description], NSStringFromSelector(_cmd)); in both viewDidLoad and viewDidUnload of a view controller.

In the log, I found viewDidLoad is called a lot more than viewDidUnload when the app mo开发者_运维知识库ves to and from different .nibs.

Why?


The viewDidLoad and viewDidUnload is not corresponding to each other.

The viewDidUnload will only be called when you receive a memory warning. The system then will automatically call your viewDidUnload.

In the normal case, when you push a MyViewController and pop it out. The life cycle will happens like this:

init

viewDidLoad

release

That means, whenever you init and push/present a view, a viewDidLoad will be called. But when you pop the view, the release will be called in normal case and viewDidUnload will be called in memory warning case.

This is quite implicit and Apple doesn't state it clearly on the Guide. Here is some reference: Load and Unload cycle


I imagine that in the cases where -viewDidUnload wasn't called, the view controller was released.

  1. viewDidLoad: controller loads view
  2. viewDidUnload: memory warning, controller unloads view
  3. viewDidLoad: controller loads view again
  4. -: controller gets released, doesn't explicitly unload the view

You and up with 2 -viewDidLoad calls and 1 `-viewDidUnload' call.

Maybe also put a NSLog into the -dealloc method and see if the number of -dealloc and -viewDidUnload calls combined matches the number of -viewDidLoad calls.


when a new view loads, the old view can still be loaded in the background. you are searching for viewWillAppear as conterpart i think.

views only unload in case of a memorywarning.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消