I have two tables X
and Y
. This is back end of a web based CRUD application.
Let's say that rows in Y
have fields a
, b
and c
. When a row in X
is created, it has to link to a snapshot of the values in a specific row of Y
. The row in 开发者_JS百科Y
may change later but the row in X
should still have the values of a
, b
and c
at the time of creation.
What is the "correct" way of doing something like this? Duplicating the fields a
, b
and c
in X
seems to be straightforward but I was wondering if there are any better ways of doing this.
You need to implement a "Slowly Changing Dimension".
basicly in addition to the "natural" key, you also have a valid_from and valid_to timestamps.
The current row always has a "valid_to" of "9999-12-31 23:59:59" or the higest date/time you system can handle.
The first row would have:-
id valid_to valid_from description.
1 2009-12-25 9999-12-31 My best new toy.
When you change the description you do not overwrite the current row but add a complete new row an change the valid_to date in the old row thus:-
id valid_to valid_from description.
1 2009-12-25 2009-06-22 My best new toy
1 2010-06-23 9999-12-31 A broken toy.
You can then use the create date of your row Y to the appropriate row X flr that date.
Select * from x
join Y on x.id = y.id
and x.create-date >= valid_from
and x.create-date <= valid_to
I recomend you use timestamps rather than dates, but the principle is easier to illustrate using dates.
"Duplicating" the columns seems like the right move to me. Some people may erroneously think that you're violating proper database design by duplicating data, but really each table (and its columns) is holding different data. One is the "current" values and the other table has those values at a specific point in time.
An analogy would be addresses on an invoice. If you need to capture the address of a customer at the time of the invoice then you're not duplicating data by putting address columns with the invoice as well as having an address with the customer as they hold potentially different versions of the address.
精彩评论