Let's say I have 2 lists in Python and I want to loop through each one in parallel - e.g. do something with element 1 for both lists, do something with e开发者_如何学JAVAlement 2 for both lists... I know that I can do this by using an index:
for listIndex in range(len(list1)):
doSomething(list1[listIndex])
doSomething(list2[listIndex])
But is there a way to do this more intuitively, with a foreach loop? Something like for list1Value in list1, list2Value in list2
...?
I've currently run into this situation in Python, but this is a longstanding question and I'd be interested to know if you can do this in any language. (I just assumed that Python is the most likely to have a method of dealing with this.)
Something like this?
for (a,b) in zip(list1, list2):
doSomething(a)
doSomething(b)
Though if doSomething()
isn't doing I/O or updating global state, and it just works on one of the elements at a time, the order doesn't matter so you could just use chain()
(from itertools):
for x in chain(list1, list2):
doSomething(x)
Apropos, from itertools import *
is something I do very often. Consider izip()
instead of using the zip()
I gave above. Also look into izip_longest()
, izip(count(), lst)
, etc. Welcome to functional programming. :-)
Oh, and zipping also works with more "columns":
for idx, a, b, c in izip(count(), A, B, C):
...
That will depend on the language. Python actually has a rather simple method for that:
a = (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9)
b = "ABCDEFGHIJ"
for pair in zip(a,b):
print("%d => %s" % pair)
Use zip
or itertools.izip
for this:
for item1, item2 in zip(iterable1, iterable2):
# process the items in parallel
itertools.izip
in Python < 3 and zip
in Python ≥ 3 return iterators; i.e. they provide tuples of pairs (or triplets, quartets etc) on request. Python < 3 zip
creates a list of tuples, so the memory requirements could be large if the smallest of the sequences is quite long.
精彩评论