I've got a graph that I want graphviz to layout and visualize for me. The graph has 122 edges and 123 nodes. The edges are of 4 different kin开发者_如何转开发ds and I want them to be visually distinguishable. However I've not yet decided what would be the best way of doing that, I'd like to play around with the dials a bit.
Unfortunately I do not see anything like a "class" or "stylesheet" attribute for edges. I can only set visual attributes individually for every edge (lots of repetition). Perhaps I've missed something? Is there maybe some way after all to add edges to 4 different groups and then style the groups, not each edge individually?
To style edges (or nodes) by group rather than individually, use subgraph.
like so:
digraph G {
node [style=filled,color="#5D8AA8", fillcolor="#5D8AA8"];
subgraph c1 {
edge [color="#004225", arrowsize="0.6", penwidth="1"];
"node 1" -> "node 3";
"node 5" -> "node 7";
"node 1" -> "node 2";
label = "";
}
subgraph c2 {
edge [color="#FBEC5D", arrowsize="1.2", penwidth="3"];
"node 2" -> "node 4";
"node 4" -> "node 6";
"node 3" -> "node 5";
"node 6" -> "node 8";
label = "";
}
begin -> "node 1";
start -> "node 2";
"node 1" -> "node 4"
"node 2" -> "node 6";
start [shape=diamond];}
So if you put the code above in a file w/ a ".dot" extension; then render it in graphviz,, you'll see three different types of edges, appearance-wise.
One type is the just the default (color=black, thickness=1, etc.)--i.e., these edges not assigned to a subgraph.
The other two types of edges(a thin, dark-green group, and a thick, bright-yellow group) are styled based on assignment to one of two subgraph clusters.
Subgraph is often used to visually highlight a node cluster (i.e., to distinguish a particular contiguous 'group' of nodes from the rest of the nodes in the graph); however, there is no requirement (as you can see from my example) that the edges you chose to style by assignment to a given subgraph, belong to a contiguous 'group' of nodes--you can designate any edges you wish for assignment to a given sub-graph.)
to me, styling nodes by group is analogous to the HTML practice of defining a class and assigning it to a collection of divs in HTML markup
While @doug's answer is correct (use subgraphs to assign similar style to groups of objects), I believe my example is better:
digraph G {
compound=true;
subgraph columns {
c0r0 -> c0r1;
c0r1 -> c0r2;
c1r0 -> c1r1;
c1r1 -> c1r2;
c2r0 -> c2r1;
c2r1 -> c2r2;
}
subgraph rows {
edge [color=red, constraint=false];
c0r0 -> c1r0;
c1r0 -> c2r0;
c0r1 -> c1r1;
c1r1 -> c2r1;
c0r2 -> c1r2;
c1r2 -> c2r2;
}
}
cat square-digraph.dot | dot -Tsvg -o square-digraph.svg
as pointed out by @bousch subgraph is not needed.
"All edges defined below an edge style declaration with "edge [color=...etc]" will use that style."
digraph G {
compound=true;
c0r0 -> c0r1;
c0r1 -> c0r2;
c1r0 -> c1r1;
c1r1 -> c1r2;
c2r0 -> c2r1;
c2r1 -> c2r2;
edge [color=red, constraint=false];
c0r0 -> c1r0;
c1r0 -> c2r0;
c0r1 -> c1r1;
c1r1 -> c2r1;
c0r2 -> c1r2;
c1r2 -> c2r2;
}
will do the same as @bukzor.
精彩评论