OK, I'm always trying to improve the way I code, because it's my passion. I have a .dbml file (LINQ to SQL), and I use it to access my SQL Server database.
Imagine, if you will, that you have a Person table in your database and you want to provide a way to delete, add, and modify a Person record.
The way I'm handling things currently is creating classes called PersonRepository, CarRepository, DocumentRepository, etc. For each table in my database, I create a repository class.
These repository classes generally consist of something similar to this:
MyDatabaseContext db = new MyDatabaseContext();
public Person GetPersonByID(int id)
{
return db.Person.Where(p => p.ID == id);
}
Pretty much the same for the basic CRUD functionality of each table.
If I need something more specific, for example "Sergio, I need a list of all people born between x and y"; then I just add the method to the PersonReposi开发者_JAVA百科tory class.
public List<Person> GetPeopleFromDOB(DateTime x, DateTime y)
{
// Do the logic here.
}
Another idea I had was to create a DataAccess.cs class and have all of these methods in there (we would be talking around 4-5 methods per tables in existence) and have them divided by regions.
What are the more knowledgeable programmers doing and what suggestions would you offer for an eager young programmer (I'm 20 years old)?
Here are the problems with what you're doing above:
Using List when you should be using IQueryable
Why use AsQueryable() instead of List()?
Basically, you should never get data until you need it. With your approach you're always getting data from the database and subsequent LINQ queries will act on all data. Why not just build up queries and let LINQ refine things down to where it only gets what you need and only when you need it?
Using Methods when Extension Methods would be perfect
You are creating a utility class of methods with things like GetPeopleFromDOB. Why not make this an Extension method? If you make all of them return IQueryable you could use them in succession as well. E.g. GetPeople().StatusEnabled().BornInJuly().AgeIsGreaterThan( 57 );
Also, if you must do this at least consider doing so in a partial class or a static utility class.
Consider Using ActiveRecord/Repository Pattern as the root
http://compiledexperience.com/blog/posts/Implementing-an-ActiveRecord-pattern-in-Linq-to-SQL
Right now you're creating several hardcoded repositories, but you should be basing them off of Repository?
Why not use validators?
If you're using ASP.NET MVC, validation is part and parcel, however with webforms you can also use the Data Annotation Validators.
http://adventuresdotnet.blogspot.com/2009/08/aspnet-webforms-validation-with-data.html
I'd stick with the single responsibility principle and stick with your repository classes. If your database grows over time, imagine how big the DataAccess class could become. You'll get away with it for a while, but it will grow and grow to the point where you have thousands of lines of code in a class (I have seen 15000+ lines in such a class before) and you're stuck!
You'll want to use a repository to connect directly with your DBML using L2S.
Then you'll want to create a service that talks to your repository.
Finally you'll use the service in things like your code-behind or your MVC controller.
User Repository
Namespace Data
#Region "Interface"
Public Interface IUserRepository
Function GetAllUsers() As IList(Of User)
Function GetUserByID(ByVal id As Integer) As User
End Interface
#End Region
#Region "Repository"
Public Class UserRepository : Implements IUserRepository
Private dc As MyDataContext
Public Sub New()
dc = New MyDataContext
End Sub
Public Function GetAllUsers() As System.Collections.Generic.IList(Of User) Implements IUserRepository.GetAllUsers
Dim users = From u In dc.Users
Select u
Return users.ToList
End Function
Public Function GetUserByID(ByVal id As Integer) As User Implements IUserRepository.GetUserByID
Dim viewUser = (From u In dc.Users
Where u.ID = id
Select u).FirstOrDefault
Return viewUser
End Function
End Class
#End Region
End Namespace
User Service
Namespace Data
#Region "Interface"
Public Interface IUserService
Function GetAllUsers() As IList(Of User)
Function GetUserByID(ByVal id As Integer) As User
End Interface
#End Region
#Region "Service"
Public Class UserService : Implements IUserService
Private _ValidationDictionary As IValidationDictionary
Private _UserRepository As IUserRepository
Public Sub New(ByVal validationDictionary As IValidationDictionary, ByVal UserRepository As IUserRepository)
_ValidationDictionary = validationDictionary
_UserRepository = UserRepository
End Sub
Public Function GetAllUsers() As System.Collections.Generic.IList(Of User) Implements IUserService.GetAllUsers
Return _UserRepository.GetAllUsers
End Function
Public Function GetUserByID(ByVal id As Integer) As User Implements IUserService.GetUserByID
Return _UserRepository.GetUserByID(id)
End Function
End Class
#End Region
End Namespace
Now just make sure to use CRUD like you mentioned above.
Also, please forgive my VB. You might need to run it through the http://converter.telerik.com code converter to get the C# stuff.
精彩评论