Crash with new/delete, but not with malloc/free in C++ code

My developement environment is [Windows 7; visual studio 2010; x86].

I have a dll that was built for server 2003 long time back. When I use it in my project and follow new/delete sequence to use a class, application crashes during delete call. I verified the same even without any other call between new and delete. When I replace new/delete with malloc/free, there is no crash. If I simply 开发者_如何学JAVAdeclare an instance of the class without new, no crash happens when scope is exited.

Any idea what may be going wrong? This is internal library of our company, so I will not be able to name it and other such stuff.

Additional Information: To use this library in first place, I had to turn off VS feature "Treat wchar_t as built-in type".

Code is simple

{
   CLogger * myLog = new CLogger(); 
   delete myLog; // Crash happens here 
} 

{ // No crash here 
  CLogger MyLog; 
} 

{ 
  CLogger * myLog = (CLogger *) malloc (sizeof(CLogger)); 
  free (myLog); // This does not crash. 
} 

This being proprietary library, I cannot post constructor and destructor.

---

delete does more than just freeing memory: it also calls the destructor before. That means that there must be something bad in the destructor of that class.

If an uncaught exception occurs in a destructor the whole process exits (*). As commented below (thanks for the good feedback) this is over-simplified here is a good link for more details: throwing exceptions out of a destructor

I would recommend you to put a

try {} catch (std::exception& e){} catch(...) {}

inside the destructor and log out what is going on, or better let it go through the debugger with the option to stop at the place where the exception is thrown.

Then it should be easy to identify what is different. Just a guess from me, it may be some registry access or file access rights, where some changes were introduced from server 2003 to windows 7.

---

I apply my psychic debugging skills to suggest that you are using delete where you should be using delete[].

Reasoning: if you were able to trivially replace new with malloc, you're probably allocating an array of primitive types rather than an object, and naively using delete in place of free on the assumption that object allocation and array allocation are the same in C++. (They're not.)