开发者

Ampersand vs plus for concatenating strings in VB.NET [duplicate]

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-01-03 01:25 出处:网络
This question already has answers here: 开发者_如何学GoString manipulation with & or + in VB.NET
This question already has answers here: 开发者_如何学Go String manipulation with & or + in VB.NET (6 answers) Closed 6 years ago.

In VB.NET, is there any advantage to using & to concatenate strings instead of +?

For example

Dim x as String = "hello" + " there"

vs.

Dim x as String = "hello" & " there"

Yes, I know for a lot of string concatenations I'd want to use StringBuilder, but this is more of a general question.


Microsoft's preference is for VB programmers to use & for strings and not +.

You can also use the + operator to concatenate strings. However, to eliminate ambiguity, you should use the & operator instead.


I've heard good, strong arguments in favor of both operators. Which argument wins the day depends largely on your situation. The one thing I can say is that you should standardize on one or the other. Code that mixes the two is asking for confusion later.

The two arguments I remember right now for favoring &:

  • If you're not using Option Strict and have two numeric strings, it's easy for the compiler to confuse your meaning of of the + operator with, you know, arithmetic addition
  • If you're updating a lot of older vb6-era code it helps not to have to convert the concatenation operators ( and remember: we want consistency).

And for +:

  • If you have a mixed vb/C# shop, it's nice to only have one concatenation operator. It makes it easier to move code between languages and means just that much less of a context switch for programmers when moving back and forth between languages
  • & is almost unique to VB, while + between strings is understood in many languages to mean concatenation, so you gain a little something in readability.


I prefer using & for string concatenations in VB.NET

One reason for this is to avoid any confusion e.g

MessageBox.Show(1 & 2) ' "12"
MessageBox.Show(1 + 2) ' 3


It's safer to use & since you're making your intention clear to the compiler (I want to concatenate these two values and they should both be converted to strings).

Using + can lead to hard to find bugs if the strings are numerical values, at least if the option strict is off.

For example:

1 + "1" = 2 ' this fails if option strict is on
1 & "1" = 11

Edit: though if you're concatenating a non-string you should probably use some better method anyway.


I suppose it is historical (non .NET Visual Basic uses &, not sure why they introduced the +) and a matter of taste (I prefer & because we concatenate strings, we don't add them...).

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消