I'm using a library that manipulates a binary search tree. In this library is a function that traverses the tree and passes each node it finds to a callback class:
bool TCODBsp::traverseInvertedLevelOrder(ITCODBspCallback *callback, void *userData)
ITCODBspCallback
is a base class in the library from which the user is supposed to derive his own callback class to pass to the function. Here is the base class:
class ITCODBspCallback {
public :
virtual bool visitNode(TCODBsp *node, void *userData) = 0;
};
Here's my derived class:
class MyCallback: public ITCODBspCallback
{
public:
virtual bool visitNode(TCODBsp*, void*); // defined in my implementation file
};
I then pass MyCallback
to the function like this:
bsp->traverseInvertedLevelOrder(new MyCallback(), NULL);
and g++ gives me the following errors:
expected type-specifier before 'MyCallback'
expected ')' before 'MyCallback'
no matching function for call to 'TCODBsp::traverseInvertedLevelOrder(int*, NULL)'
note: candidates are: bool TCODBsp::traverseInvertedLevelOrder(ITCODBspCallback*, void*)
Anyone know what's wrong? I'm curious why it thinks MyCallback
is an int*
, in particular.
This all looks like you forgot to include the MyCallback
header. Since its parser doesn't interpret MyCallback
as a type if it doesn't know it is one, it comes up with an own type, and ignores MyCallback()
, i think. The type it comes up with is int*
.
Notice that your code leaks because you need to call delete
on any new
'ed object. There is nothing wrong with creating objects like this:
MyCallback b;
bsp->traverseInvertedLevelOrder(&b, NULL);
In this case you are free'd of memory management.
精彩评论