I have this formatted string that I am having a translator work on.
ENGLISH
"Check out the %1$@ %2$@ in %3$@: %4$@" = "Check out the %1$@ %2$@ in %3$@: %4$@"
GERMAN TRANSLATION
"Check out the %1$@ %2$@ in %3$@: %4$@" = "Hör Dir mal %2$@ in %3$@ an: %4$@";
These are passed to a [NSString stringWithFormat:]
call:
//////////////////////////////////////
// Share Over Twitter
NSString *frmt = NSLocalizedString(@"Check out the %1$@ %2$@ in %3$@: %4$@", @"The default tweet for sharing sounds. Use %1$@ for where the sound type (Sound, mix, playlist) will be, %2$@ for where the audio name will be, %3$@ for the app name, and %3$@ for where the sound link will be.");
NSString *urlString = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"sounds/%@", SoundSoundI开发者_如何学PythonD(audio)];
NSString *url = ([audio audioType] == UAAudioTypeSound ? UrlFor(urlString) : APP_SHORTLINK);
NSString *msg = [NSString stringWithFormat:
frmt,
[[Audio titleForAudioType:[audio audioType]] lowercaseString],
[NSString stringWithFormat:@"\"%@\"", AudioName(audio)],
APP_NAME,
url];
returnString = msg;
With the desired and actual outcome of:
ENGLISH
desired: "Check out the sound "This Sound Name" in My App Name: link_to_sound" actual: "Check out the sound "This Sound Name" in My App Name: link_to_sound"
GERMAN
desired: "Hör Dir mal "This Sound Name" in My App Name an: link_to_sound" actual: "Hör Dir mal sound in "This Sound Name" an: My App Name"
THE PROBLEM
The problem is that I was under the assumption that by using numbered variable in the -[NSString stringWithFormat:]
, I could do things like this, where the %1$@
variable is completely omitted. If you notice, the German translation of the format string does not use the first argument (%1$@
) at all but it ("sound") still appears in the output string.
What am I doing wrong?
This is not a bug. Numbered arguments are not part of the C standard, but part of IEEE Std 1003.1, which says the following (emphasis mine):
The format can contain either numbered argument conversion specifications (that is, "%n$" and "*m$"), or unnumbered argument conversion specifications (that is, % and * ), but not both. The only exception to this is that %% can be mixed with the "%n$" form. The results of mixing numbered and unnumbered argument specifications in a format string are undefined. When numbered argument specifications are used, specifying the Nth argument requires that all the leading arguments, from the first to the (N-1)th, are specified in the format string.
Looks like a bug to me. I think you should file a bug.
CFString's formatting engine is independent from fprintf
's so there could be some differences. For instance,
printf("a %3$s\n", "b", "c", "d"); // prints "a d"
NSLog(@"a %3$s\n", "b", "c", "d"); // prints "a b"
You need to supply all previous specifiers because the width of an argument doesn't need to be fixed, e.g
printf("%2$llx %1$llx\n", 1LL, 2LL); // prints "2 1"
printf("%2$llx\n", 1LL, 2LL); // prints "200000000" !!
NSLog(@"%2$llx %1$llx\n", 1LL, 2LL); // prints "2 1"
NSLog(@"%2$llx\n", 1LL, 2LL); // prints "1"
iPhone OS's printf
skips 4 bytes on 1 missing specifier, and CFString's formatter skips 0 bytes.
The solutions are:
Rearrange your indices, e.g.
"Check out the %4$@ %1$@ in %2$@: %3$@" "Hör Dir mal %1$@ in %2$@ an: %3$@";
or
use the format
[@"%1$10p%2$10p%3$10p%4$10p" stringByAppendingString:frmt]
to force all arguments to be used, and then chop out the first 40 characters with
-substringFromIndex:
, orConvert all ObjC objects into C strings (
char*
) and usesnprintf
.- Write your own formatting engine.
精彩评论