How much does an InnoDB table benefit from having fixed-length rows?

I know that dependent 开发者_JS百科on the database storage engine in use, a performance benefit can be found if all of the rows in the table can be guaranteed to be the same length (by avoiding nullable columns and not using any VARCHAR, TEXT or BLOB columns). I'm not clear on how far this applies to InnoDB, with its funny table arrangements. Let's give an example: I have the following table

CREATE TABLE `PlayerGameRcd` (
    `User` SMALLINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
    `Game` MEDIUMINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
    `GameResult` ENUM('Quit',
                      'Kicked by Vote',
                      'Kicked by Admin',
                      'Kicked by System',
                      'Finished 5th',
                      'Finished 4th',
                      'Finished 3rd',
                      'Finished 2nd',
                      'Finished 1st',
                      'Game Aborted',
                      'Playing',
                      'Hide'
                      ) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'Playing',
    `Inherited` TINYINT NOT NULL,
    `GameCounts` TINYINT NOT NULL,
    `Colour` TINYINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
    `Score` SMALLINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
    `NumLongTurns` TINYINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
    `Notes` MEDIUMTEXT,
    `CurrentOccupant` TINYINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
    PRIMARY KEY (`Game`, `User`),
    UNIQUE KEY `PGR_multi_uk` (`Game`, `CurrentOccupant`, `Colour`),
    INDEX `Stats_ind_PGR` (`GameCounts`, `GameResult`, `Score`, `User`),
    INDEX `GameList_ind_PGR` (`User`, `CurrentOccupant`, `Game`, `Colour`),
    CONSTRAINT `Constr_PlayerGameRcd_User_fk`
        FOREIGN KEY `User_fk` (`User`) REFERENCES `User` (`UserID`)
        ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
    CONSTRAINT `Constr_PlayerGameRcd_Game_fk`
        FOREIGN KEY `Game_fk` (`Game`) REFERENCES `Game` (`GameID`)
        ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE
) ENGINE=INNODB CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci

The only column that is nullable is Notes, which is MEDIUMTEXT. This table presently has 33097 rows (which I appreciate is small as yet). Of these rows, only 61 have values in Notes. How much of an improvement might I see from, say, adding a new table to store the Notes column in and performing LEFT JOINs when necessary?

---

Text and Blob fields are stored separate from the table (which requres additional on disk lookup for the value). Each time a subquery results from the table will require a temporary table, the temporary table will be immediatelly be created on disk, since mysql can not predict the row size and reserve enough space in memory.

If the size of your Notes field does not exceed 64k, I would recommend using VARCHAR instead. If the contents of the Notes will never exceed 1000 characters, use VARCHAR(1000).