开发者

UTC time stamp on Windows

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-30 10:44 出处:网络
I have a buffer with the UTC tim开发者_JAVA技巧e stamp in C, I broadcast that buffer after every ten seconds. The problem is that the time difference between two packets is not consistent. After 5 to

I have a buffer with the UTC tim开发者_JAVA技巧e stamp in C, I broadcast that buffer after every ten seconds. The problem is that the time difference between two packets is not consistent. After 5 to 10 iterations the time difference becomes 9, 11 and then again 10. Kindly help me to sort out this problem.

I am using <time.h> for UTC time.


If your time stamp has only 1 second resolution then there will always be +/- 1 uncertainty in the least significant digit (i.e. +/- 1 second in this case).

Clarification: if you only have a resolution of 1 second then your time values are quantized. The real time, t, represented by such a quantized value has a range of t..t+0.9999. If you take the difference of two such times, t0 and t1, then the maximum error in t1-t0 is -0.999..+0.999, which when quantized is +/-1 second. So in your case you would expect to see difference values in the range 9..11 seconds.


A thread that sleeps for X milliseconds is not guaranteed to sleep for precisely that many milliseconds. I am assuming that you have a statement that goes something like:

while(1) {
  ...
  sleep(10); // Sleep for 10 seconds.
  // fetch timestamp and send
}

You will get a more accurate gauge of time if you sleep for shorter periods (say 20 milliseconds) in a loop checking until the time has expired. When you sleep for 10 seconds, your thread gets moved further out of the immediate scheduling priority of the underlying OS.

You might also take into account that the time taken to send the timestamps may vary, depending on network conditions, etc, if you do a sleep(10) -> send ->sleep(10) type of loop, the time taken to send will be added onto the next sleep(10) in real terms.

Try something like this (forgive me, my C is a little rusty):

bool expired = false;
double last, current;
double t1, t2;
double difference = 0;

while(1) {
   ...
   last = (double)clock();
   while(!expired) {
      usleep(200); // sleep for 20 milliseconds
      current = (double)clock();
      if(((current - last) / (double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC) >= (10.0 - difference))
        expired = true;
   }
   t1 = (double)clock();
   // Set and send the timestamp.
   t2 = (double)clock();
   //
   // Calculate how long it took to send the stamps.
   // and take that away from the next sleep cycle.
   //
   difference = (t2 - t1) / (double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
   expired = false;
 }

If you are not bothered about using the standard C library, you could look at using the high resolution timer functionality of windows such as QueryPerformanceFrequency/QueryPerformanceCounter functions.

LONG_INTEGER freq;
LONG_INTEGER t2, t1;
//
// Get the resolution of the timer.
//
QueryPerformanceFrequency(&freq);

// Start Task.
QueryPerformanceCounter(&t1);

... Do something ....

QueryPerformanceCounter(&t2);

// Very accurate duration in seconds.
double duration = (double)(t2.QuadPart - t1.QuadPart) / (double)freq.QuadPart;
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消