FastObjects.NET(is an OODB from Versant) performance in Real Scenarios?

FastObjects.NET Saves the whole class object(if marked with attribute Persistent) at once in file system(using serilization or similar technology).

They are promissing that it is even faster then normal SQL DB approach. My team also thought it is better and faster to save the whole object once instead of each field one by one.

Definition of their website:

FastObjects .NET 10.0 fully开发者_JS百科 conforms to the Microsoft.NET 2.0 framework. Tightly integrated with Visual Studio 2005, it offers a developer-friendly, object-oriented alternative to a relational database for .NET persistence.

I want to have your experiences of using FastObjects in production scenario? They are promising for Indexing/Transaction/clustoring/replication.

---

The guys at Versant have actually deprecated the FastObjects product in favor of their newer more scalable database for .NET ... which is their prior Linux/UNIX version just called Versant or the Versant Object Database.

As I understand it, they recently released a version 8.0 of The Versant Object Database which includes a .NET binding which is just like the old FastObjects API. The Versant Object Database is running some seriously demanding applications .... e.g American Stock Exchange options trading systems, Sabre - Travelocity reservations systems ( original application for which IBM developed the mainframe ), HPC compute clusters for space agency, etc.

So, now you can get that super scalable high performance database which stores pure objects ( no DDL required ) for the .NET platform and fully integrated with Visual Studio.

http://www.versant.com/en_US/products/objectdatabase/VOD_NET/

Hope this helps.... -Robert