I'm having trouble with the Random class in .NET, I'm implementing a threaded collection which is working fine, except for one smaller detail. The collection is a Skip list and those of you familiar with it know that for every node inserted I need to generate a new height that is <= CurrentMaxHeight+1
, here's the code that I'm using to do that (I know it's very inefficient, but it works and that开发者_运维百科s my main priority now)
int randomLevel()
{
int height = 1;
while(rnd.NextDouble() >= 0.5 && height < MaxHeight)
++height;
return height;
}
My problem here is that sometimes I keep getting only 1 back from this for several thousand elements in a row which kills the performance of the skip list. The chance for 10.000 elements to generate only 1 from this method in a row, seems very slim (happens pretty consistently).
So I'm assuming (guessing) that there is a problem with the Random
object in some way, but I don't really know where to start digging around. So I turn to stackoverflow to see if anyone has an idea?
Edit
The rnd-variable is declared in the class SkipList<T>
, and it is accessed from several threads (each thread calls .Add on the collection and Add calls .randomLevel)
Try lock
ing the Random
object.
int RandomLevel()
{
int height = 1;
lock(rnd)
{
while(rnd.NextDouble >= 0.5 && height < MaxHeight) height++;
}
return height;
}
There may be an issue with collisions when multiple threads access the Random
object at the same time, and the seed might be getting corrupted. I can't offer any insight into what might be specifically happening, but according to MSDN, instance members of the Random
type are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, so a lock
seems called for in any event.
I wouldn't lock the entire while loop. Just lock the rnd.NextDouble() calls.
int RandomLevel()
{
int height = 1;
double newRand;
lock(rnd) { newRand = rnd.NextDouble(); }
while(newRand >= 0.5 && height < MaxHeight)
{
height++;
lock(rnd) { newRand = rnd.NextDouble(); }
}
return height;
}
Although if performance is a consideration, I would certainly compare both solutions, as there might be a difference in single threaded vs. multithreaded performance.
It looks as though your loop runs less than half the time it's called - is that what you're looking for (when a random number between 0 and 1 is > 0.5? This could explain why you're getting "1" more often than you'd expect - at least half the time, it's not even running the loop that increments height - it just sets the height to 1, doesn't change it, and then returns "1". I'm not familiar with skip lists, so this might be intentional, but I thought I'd ask.
I'm not too familiar with working with random numbers, but is it possible that you've got a seeding problem? If you're not randomizing the Random object when you instantiate it, it may return a predictable stream of numbers, instead of ones that are truly random. Perhaps not causing the behavior you're seeing here, but something to consider moving forward.
精彩评论