My p4 repository has a structure similar to:
//depot/project/branch1
//depot/project/branch2
//depot/project/branch3
... etc
However, when I use git-p4
to clone "project", all 3 branches are not considered as branches and all get cloned into the single master branch.
This is how I'm invoking git-p4
:
git-p4 clone --detect-branches //depot/project
I was expecting git-p4
to create a git database for "project
" with three branches, and the root of the project would be mapped to the portion of the path after the branch name (for example: if //depot/project/branch1
has a subdirectory called "lib
" (//depot/project/branch1/lib
) then my local file system should be something like /git_project/lib
with 3 git branches).
Is what I'm expecting wrong? Am I in开发者_JAVA技巧voking git-p4
incorrectly?
If you look at git-p4 code (also originally here), you see:
if self.detectBranches:
branches = self.splitFilesIntoBranches(description)
for branch in branches.keys():
## HACK --hwn
branchPrefix = self.depotPaths[0] + branch + "/"
with splitFilesIntoBranches
exploring the p4 repo for branches.
So maybe git-p4 clone //depot/project@all --detect-branches
would be fine (with the @all as in this SO answer, and the --detect-branches
option after the repo path)?
That being said, if the script is not smart enough to manage that, may be a simpler solution is to run it 3 times, one per branch and import the result in one Git repo.
I just worked on a related bug with --detect-branches
. The script does a few things:
- detect the branch names using p4 data
- create a map of the parent of each branch
- map the files to a specific branch
- remove the branch prefix before committing into git
You'll have to follow the code to make sure each step is being done correctly. Using pdb
to do this works well enough.
Step 1 and 2 is done in P4Sync.getBranchMapping
Step 3 is done in P4Sync.splitFilesIntoBranches
For step 4. this is done with P4Sync.stripRepoPath
. Set a break point there, and you can see if the branches have been detected and files are being renamed properly.
精彩评论